Search

Search form

Defence casts Samphan as young idealist

Defence casts Samphan as young idealist

Co-lawyers for Khieu Samphan wrapped up their closing arguments at the Khmer Rouge tribunal yesterday by asserting, as they did on Friday, that the trial simply lacked the evidence to prove criminal intent on their client’s behalf.

Painting Samphan as a “pure intellectual” divorced from the military and security apparatus of the regime, the defence sought to pick apart holes in witness testimony relied upon by the prosecution connecting him to several senior decision-making positions.

In particular, Samphan’s role as head of state, national co-lawyer Kong Sam Onn told the court, was merely a nominal position given to a well-intentioned intellectual who was popular with the people.

The prosecution’s characterisation of the communists as having immediately transformed the nation into a pre-conceived “slave state” in April 1975 was “simplistic”, lawyer Arthur Vercken continued.

By forgetting the Cold War backdrop to the Cambodian civil war that preceded Democratic Kampuchea, the case file amounted to asking the chamber to “judge the accused for wanting to set up a communist regime”, he said.

In saying the situation at the end of the regime was comparable to that of April 1975, Vercken added, prosecutors had offered “an affront to … logic of the most elementary kind”.

Co-lawyer Anta Guisse then questioned Samphan’s alleged role in the decision to forcibly evacuate Phnom Penh, focusing in particular on a key witness who allegedly mixed up dates of decision-making meetings that Samphan is said to have attended.

“I don’t know whether I need to remind you, but it is a fundamental principle in criminal law that when there is doubt, it is [to] the benefit of the accused,” Guisse said.

She went on to challenge evidence presented by the prosecution that Samphan was head of the “nebulous” Office 870 – tasked with monitoring the implementation of CPK policy.

Why, Guisse questioned, despite evidence to the contrary, was it so important for the prosecution to prove Samphan was head of that office?

“In order to establish a link and hold him criminally responsible for what happened during Democratic Kampuchea,” she answered.

In her closing salvos, Guisse returned to an image of a young, idealistic communist who dreamt of progress.

“This is a man trying desperately to [understand] why what happened did not work. The aim was not to make Cambodia suffer. It was to take the country forward,” she said.

Although things went wrong, the evidence that Samphan had a “criminal objective” implicating him in a joint criminal enterprise with other leaders does not exist, Guisse continued.

“They were not organised; they may have been incompetent, but they did not have criminal intent. That, in a criminal trial, is what matters.”

RECOMMENDED STORIES

  • Breaking: PM says prominent human rights NGO ‘must close’

    Prime Minister Hun Sen has instructed the Interior Ministry to investigate the Cambodian Center for Human Rights (CCHR) and potentially close it “because they follow foreigners”, appearing to link the rights group to the opposition Cambodia National Rescue Party's purported “revolution”. The CNRP - the

  • Rainsy and Sokha ‘would already be dead’: PM

    Prime Minister Hun Sen on Sunday appeared to suggest he would have assassinated opposition leaders Sam Rainsy and Kem Sokha had he known they were promising to “organise a new government” in the aftermath of the disputed 2013 national elections. In a clip from his speech

  • Massive ceremony at Angkor Wat will show ‘Cambodia not in anarchy’: PM

    Government officials, thousands of monks and Prime Minister Hun Sen himself will hold a massive prayer ceremony at Angkor Wat in early December to highlight the Kingdom’s continuing “peace, independence and political stability”, a spectacle observers said was designed to disguise the deterioration of

  • PM tells workers CNRP is to blame for any sanctions

    In a speech to workers yesterday, Prime Minister Hun Sen pinned the blame for any damage inflicted on Cambodia’s garment industry by potential economic sanctions squarely on the opposition party. “You must remember clearly that if the purchase orders are reduced, it is all