Dear Editor,
Your December 21 article (Swedes drop Mobitel case) details
an outrageous attempt by two of Cambodia's seniormost officials to defend the
practise of bribery.
You say that Sar Kheng, Minister of Interior and
Deputy Prime Minister, as well as Heng Samrin, Vice-Chairman of the National
Assembly, have written to the speaker of the Swedish Parliament stating that
Mobitel's payment since 1997 of US$ 2,500 per month to the Minister of Post and
Telecommunications for his services as an "honorary advisor" to the company does
not constitute a violation of Cambodian law.
How Sar Kheng and Heng
Samrin have come to this conclusion is difficult to understand, and neither
offers in their letters an explanation as to why the bribery provision of the
criminal law in force should not apply to Mobitel and Mr Zaman, the
representative of Mobitel's Swedish mother company Millicom International
Cellular.
Article 58 of the Transitional Criminal Provisions, the law in
force, reads:
"Any person who corrupts or attempts to corrupt any elected
official, civil servant, military personnel, or official agent of any of the
four Cambodian parties to the Paris Agreement or of any registered political
party who, while performing official duties or tasks related to such duties, by
promising property, service, money, staff, professional position, document,
authorization or any benefit whatsoever in exchange for any one of these same
benefits is guilty of bribery and shall be liable to a punishment of one to
three years in prison."
The crime of bribery thus requires that the money
is given in exchange for a benefit and that it is paid to an elected official, a
civil servant, military personnel or an official agent of the four Cambodian
parties to the Paris Agreements or any registered political party.
These
requirements seem to be fulfilled. The payments made to the Minister have
obviously been paid in exchange for a benefit, considering that he has been a
well paid " honorary advisor" at a time during which he has had control over
decisions of considerable value and importance to the company.
The
Minister is also an agent of a political party. This is proven by the fact that
the Law on the Organization of the Council of Ministers, Article 5, provides
that a person in order to qualify as a Minister must belong to a political party
represented in the National Assembly.
Why Heng Samrin has come to the
defense of Mobitel is unknown to the writer of this letter. However, it is
interesting that Sar Kheng has been using his position as Deputy Prime Minister
and Minister of Interior to try to influence the criminal investigation
undertaken by the Swedish authorities.
It is no secret that Sar Kheng has
good connections with the Swedish company. His visit to Sweden in March 2001,
organized by Mr Zaman and Mobitel's mother company Millicom International
Cellular, was well covered in the Khmer press.
Name withheld on request
Contact PhnomPenh Post for full article
Post Media Co LtdThe Elements Condominium, Level 7
Hun Sen Boulevard
Phum Tuol Roka III
Sangkat Chak Angre Krom, Khan Meanchey
12353 Phnom Penh
Cambodia
Telegram: 092 555 741
Email: [email protected]