​NATURAL RESOURCE REVENUES: Blessing or Curse? | Phnom Penh Post

NATURAL RESOURCE REVENUES: Blessing or Curse?

National

Publication date
06 September 2007 | 19:00 ICT

Reporter : Post Staff

More Topic

Born Samnang (C) cries as he is led away by police after learning that he and another man, Sok Sam Oeun, would be sent back to prison for the 2004 murder of unionist Chea Vichea, outside the Appeal Court yesterday in Phnom Penh. Photograph: Vireak Mai/Phnom Penh Post

The impending development of offshore oil fields recently discovered in Cambodia's

territorial waters, and continuing onshore exploration, may herald significant changes

to the country's economy in the near future.

But it remains to be seen whether the billions of dollars in revenue expected from

these developments will raise the living standards of Cambodians, 40% of whom live

below the poverty line.

In our view, it is critical for the Government to ensure that the receipt and expenditure

of oil and other natural resource revenues are made transparent and are subject to

public scrutiny. After all, resource revenue is meant to be a blessing for Cambodia

and should not, through corruption or mismanagement, become a curse.

Let us consider why transparency is crucial in the context of Cambodia's extractive

industry.

'Resource Curse'

The annual sales of oil and other natural resources in the future will be substantial,

possibly in the billions of dollars. However, that does not necessarily mean that

Cambodia, or its citizens, will be better off in the long run.

On the contrary, resource rich countries may, if they do not follow a prudent fiscal

policy, be struck by what economists term the 'resource curse' - i.e. the paradox

that countries with an abundance of natural resources tend to have less economic

growth than countries without these natural resources. In fact, despite billions

of dollars of incoming revenues from oil, gas and mining extraction, citizens of

more than 50 resource rich countries around the world remain steeped in poverty.

There are several reasons for this phenomenon, including a decline in the competitiveness

of other economic sectors (caused by appreciation of the real exchange rate as resource

revenues enter an economy); volatility of revenues from the natural resource sector;

and government mismanagement and/or corruption, provoked by the inflows of easy windfalls

from the resource sector.

The impact of the 'resource curse' is not limited to the economic sphere. Local populations

in resource rich countries often suffer its adverse effects as well. These effects

include the destruction of their immediate environment and the social and economic

devastation that follows: i.e. arbitrary eviction and dispossession, unlawful arrest

or harassment, and neglect of health care, housing, and education.

Corruption & Mismanagement - A Dangerous Cycle

Will Cambodia fall prey to the "resource curse" in the future? Unfortunately,

there are few indicators for confidence for good development outcomes.

Endemic government corruption and mismanagement, which the "resource curse"

thrives on, have become part and parcel of Cambodian life. Cambodia ranks 151 out

of 163 countries on Transparency International's Corruption Index 2006. An independent

research study published in July 2006 shows that unofficial fees and commissions

paid to public officials by private companies amount to about US$330 million, which

represents about 50% of the total Government budget revenue (or about 6% of GDP)

at that time.

The draft Anti-Corruption Law, which was designed to combat corruption and misfeasance,

has not been enacted, even though more than 10 years have passed since it was first

conceived.

The Government has done very little to improve the situation. As far as the oil sector

is concerned, there is no legislation in place to govern exploration or production

by the companies. The criterion upon which exploration concessions are awarded to

oil companies by the relevant authority, the Cambodian National Petroleum Authority,

is kept secret. In most cases, there is limited information, if any, about the Government's

expenditure of signature bonuses, commissions or incidental revenues received from

oil companies.

The legal and regulatory framework governing the hard minerals sector is no better.

Although the "Law on Management and Exploitation of Mineral Resources"

was enacted in 2001, it has several loopholes. For instance, notwithstanding its

name, it does not provide any mechanism to monitor the exploitation of mineral resources

by companies once they have been granted a licence to do so. Further, it does not

require that the companies disclose any information about their contracts or payments.

In fact, under article 20 of the law, such public information is protected! It cannot

be publicly disclosed unless their licence is terminated or if they give prior approval

to allow such disclosure.

In the circumstances, there is a genuine fear that public officials will misappropriate

a substantial portion of the revenues generated by the extractive industry in the

future. Not only would this severely undermine Cambodia's social and economic stability,

but it would also perpetuate a cycle of corruption, mismanagement and bad governance.

Put simply, this cycle involves four stages.

The Government could first find that it is easier to maintain authority through allocating

resources to favoured constituents and private enterprises than through growth-oriented

economic policies and a level, well-regulated playing field.

Next, huge flows of money from natural resources could, in turn, fuel this corruption

and mismanagement.

Very soon, the Government could find that it has less of a need to improve the institutional

infrastructure or to regulate and tax a productive economy outside the natural resource

sector, thereby resulting in the economy remaining undeveloped or, worse, suffering

a decline.

Finally, all this could exacerbate social divisions and impede social development.

Cambodia should be spared such a fate.

Transparency - An Antidote

We believe that insisting on transparency in the manner in which resource revenues

are received and managed by the Government is the only way to ensure that there is

an effective check on the Government's receipt and use of these revenues. Only then

can the Cambodian people, the true owners of these natural resources, understand

what these resources yield to the national budget and scrutinize the actions of public

officials and their Government.

Transparency is in the best interests of everyone concerned - citizens, mining, gas

and oil companies, the Government and the wider international community.

If companies disclose what they pay, and the Government discloses its receipt of

revenues and the way in which it utilizes these revenues, non-state actors such as

civil society organizations, international organizations/financial institutions,

donors and other watch-dogs in Cambodia will be able to compare the two and thus

hold the Government accountable for the management of this valuable source of income.

Revenue transparency will also help these groups to work towards a democratic debate

over the effective use and allocation of resource revenues and public finance in

order to meet development objectives, improve public services, and redistribute income.

Mining, gas and oil companies cannot control how the Government spends the taxes,

royalties and fees they pay. But they have a social responsibility to disclose the

payments they make so that Cambodian citizens can hold the Government accountable.

More than any legal licence conferred by the Government, transparency will strengthen

these companies' social licence by demonstrating their economic contribution to society.

It would also increase the likelihood that the revenues they pay to governments will

be used for sustainable development, which creates a stable business environment,

rather than being diverted or dissipated by corruption.

We commend the Government for setting up the Public Financial Management Reform Program,

which aims to strengthen Parliament's capacity to oversee the national budget and

assess the contribution from the extractive industry towards the budget. But greater

transparency is necessary.

Mandating disclosure of payments and revenues is an antidote to the resource curse

(and its consequent ill effects) and can be achieved by way of simple adjustments

to the existing law, accounting standards, disclosure rules, and the lending conditions

of international financial institutions, regional development banks, export credit

agencies and private sector banks.

In order to realize the dream of a prosperous and developed Cambodia that thrives

on its natural resources, companies must disclose what they pay for these resources

and the Government must disclose the revenues it receives and account for how it

spends them.

Promoting transparency of revenues in relation to the extractive industry is a vital

step towards alleviating the crushing poverty of ordinary Cambodian citizens and

ensuring good governance, corporate accountability and sustainable development in

the long run.

Pen Rany

Court Watch Project Manager

Mahdev Mohan

Pro Bono Attorney

Contact PhnomPenh Post for full article

Post Media Co Ltd
The Elements Condominium, Level 7
Hun Sen Boulevard

Phum Tuol Roka III
Sangkat Chak Angre Krom, Khan Meanchey
12353 Phnom Penh
Cambodia

Telegram: 092 555 741
Email: [email protected]