Search

Search form

Logo of Phnom Penh Post newspaper Phnom Penh Post - Policy lost on some campaigners

Policy lost on some campaigners

Cambodian People’s Party youth hold party flags during an ongoing political rally on Sihanouk Boulevard in Phnom Penh
Cambodian People’s Party youth hold party flags during an ongoing political rally on Sihanouk Boulevard. KARA FOX

Policy lost on some campaigners

WHEN the Cambodia National Rescue Party geared up for this election campaign, it was determined its priority would be policy, but the exploits of both major parties in recent weeks have seen public focus shift far from the finer details of governance.

“Change or not change?” has been a familiar chant during CNRP rallies in the first two weeks of campaigning.

The answer has always been “change” – but not everyone the Post spoke to yesterday knew exactly what change would await them if the CNRP swept to power.

“I don’t [know] the party’s policies,” said one student who rallied near the National Assembly yesterday. “I haven’t listened to what the policies are.”

A short distance away, at a CPP rally in Wat Botum park, campaigners were saying similar things about their party.

“I don’t understand what the CPP’s policies are; I came here because I love Samdech Hun Sen,” a young female university student said.

A 20-year-old man, sitting nearby, said he also didn’t understand what the CPP would offer if it won.

“I don’t know anything about their policies,” he said. “I’ve heard what they’re saying on the microphones, but I don’t understand the meaning.”

A young woman’s voice blaring from a PA nearby told passersby that a vote for the CPP was a vote to “support Samdech Hun Sen as prime minister”.

The CPP, she added, would deliver roads and bridges, guarantee sovereignty and stability, and eliminate corruption. Policy from the major parties hasn’t been much more detailed than that, commentators have said.

In a recent opinion piece published in the Post, Cambodian Center for Human Rights president Ou Virak said there appeared to be “a near complete blackout on policy discussion”.

“[People] want to hear what a future government will do about the current land crisis, how it will tackle corruption, how it will strengthen the rule of law,” he said.

The “soap opera” surrounding Cambodia National Rescue Party acting leader Kem Sokha hadn’t helped, he said.

CNRP president Sam Rainsy’s declaration over the weekend that he would return to Cambodia despite facing jail has now thrown policy further out of the limelight.

Officials from the CPP couldn’t be reached yesterday, but CNRP spokesman Yim Sovann said that his party had been spreading its policies far and wide, despite distractions such as the allegations against Sokha and the possible return of Sam Rainsy.

“We’ve been getting the same messages out,” he said. “It’s the same seven points.”

Those seven points were outlined in December, when CNRP lawmaker Son Chhay told the Post the party was seeking to focus more on everyday issues such as education, healthcare, wages, agriculture and pension schemes to provide Cambodians a genuine alternative.

“We are transforming from just being the opposition; we are becoming a realistic choice for government,” he said.

Besides wages, however, those issues have received little coverage in the media.

But the CNRP had since been focusing on door-to-door campaigns and handing out pamphlets to ensure its policies were known to people, Sovann said. “We write [the policy] short because it’s easier for people to understand.

“When we have rallies, we explain it in more detail.”

Political analyst Lao Mong Hay said that policy had recently begun finding its way to the surface.

“There actually seems to be more politics,” he said. “Last night during a televised campaign, the CPP focused on industrial development [and] education. The government’s learned, I think, that personal attacks have been counter-productive. The Kem Sokha stuff has drawn him more sympathy.”

When compared to previous national elections, Mong Hay said, this campaign was far more open and peaceful, and therefore more conducive to people getting involved.

“All parties have been able to campaign. There’s been nothing off limits. And there’s been much less violence,” he said.

As a result, the CNRP had been able to develop a “mass movement for change”, even if its policy hadn’t exactly been overt. From this point on, policies would come into play more, Mong Hay said.

But ultimately, he added, one thing – a personality – could again render them irrelevant: the return of Sam Rainsy.

“We have to think about this. It could get out of control.”

RECOMMENDED STORIES

  • Breaking: PM says prominent human rights NGO ‘must close’

    Prime Minister Hun Sen has instructed the Interior Ministry to investigate the Cambodian Center for Human Rights (CCHR) and potentially close it “because they follow foreigners”, appearing to link the rights group to the opposition Cambodia National Rescue Party's purported “revolution”. The CNRP - the

  • Rainsy and Sokha ‘would already be dead’: PM

    Prime Minister Hun Sen on Sunday appeared to suggest he would have assassinated opposition leaders Sam Rainsy and Kem Sokha had he known they were promising to “organise a new government” in the aftermath of the disputed 2013 national elections. In a clip from his speech

  • Massive ceremony at Angkor Wat will show ‘Cambodia not in anarchy’: PM

    Government officials, thousands of monks and Prime Minister Hun Sen himself will hold a massive prayer ceremony at Angkor Wat in early December to highlight the Kingdom’s continuing “peace, independence and political stability”, a spectacle observers said was designed to disguise the deterioration of

  • PM tells workers CNRP is to blame for any sanctions

    In a speech to workers yesterday, Prime Minister Hun Sen pinned the blame for any damage inflicted on Cambodia’s garment industry by potential economic sanctions squarely on the opposition party. “You must remember clearly that if the purchase orders are reduced, it is all