Search

Search form

Logo of Phnom Penh Post newspaper Phnom Penh Post - Vanishing act: Immunity is often ethereal

Vanishing act: Immunity is often ethereal

CNRP members of parliament Mu Sochua and Keo Phirom (centre left) are detained by authorities in Phnom Penh after a violent Freedom Park rally in July last year.
CNRP members of parliament Mu Sochua and Keo Phirom (centre left) are detained by authorities in Phnom Penh after a violent Freedom Park rally in July last year. Vireak Mai

Vanishing act: Immunity is often ethereal

As evening fell yesterday, Hong Sok Hour, a senator in the Sam Rainsy Party, was in hiding but still protected under the Cambodian constitution’s rules on immunity.

It’s a status few believe will last. Earlier in the day, Prime Minister Hun Sen had called for Sok Hour’s arrest on the grounds he committed treason by posting “fake” treaties related to the Cambodia-Vietnam border and an accompanying video to social media site Facebook.

But despite no arrest taking place yesterday and the postponement of a senatorial meeting on the issue, all signs point to the Senate, a body dominated by the ruling Cambodia People’s Party, moving quickly to strip Sok Hour’s immunity.

The threat of immunity being abruptly removed is a familiar one for opposition lawmakers, but also a worrying one to observers who believe the seemingly arbitrary nature of how and when it is carried out throws the authority of the nation’s charter into doubt.

Article 104 of Cambodia’s constitution states: “Senators shall enjoy parliamentary immunity.

No Senator shall be prosecuted, detained or arrested because of opinions expressed in the exercise of his/her duties.

” In fact, senators can be arrested only with the body’s consent, unless caught “in flagrante delicto”, or in the midst of committing a crime.

Article 80 uses the same language with regard to members of the National Assembly.

Opposition members have seen their immunity stripped in the past when the CPP used its majorities in both houses to effectively vote away the right: it happened to both CNRP president Sam Rainsy and lawmaker Mu Sochua in 2009.

Just two weeks ago, Hun Sen warned seven CRNP lawmakers charged with leading an “insurrection” in July 2014 – of whom Sochua is one – that their constitutionally mandated immunity would not protect them should a fresh round of summonses call them to court.

“When I was accused in 2009, my immunity was lifted because CPP had 90 seats,” Mu Sochua said yesterday.

“In 2014, our accusation, arrest and detention [happened] without [the] lifting of immunity.”

Lawyer Sok Sam Oeun said Sochua’s 2009 case demonstrated how easily immunity could be lost when unclear legal language prone to unfair interpretation – such as the “in flagrante delicto” clause – weakens the judiciary and the constitution.

“In Mu Sochua’s case, if you look at the charge, it was defamation and there was no jail. It’s a petty crime, but immunity was still revoked,” he said. “When the judiciary is weak, laws should be more clear. The judiciary can be manipulated by powerful people.”

For former Constitutional Council member Son Soubert, a longtime royal adviser, such seeming disregard for the rule of law is a worrying sign for Cambodia’s fragile democracy.

“Both [legislative bodies] are not independent, since they are ruled by the same party,” he said. “In this sense, it’s become political, not constitutional.”

Human rights worker Billy Tai said the unfolding case shows that the immunity clause is fairly conditional in practice.

“The immunity is certainly not absolute, but only a ‘qualified’ immunity that can be stripped under certain circumstances,” he said.

“However, the fact that Hun Sen is calling the shots with complete and fairly blatant disregard to the process of the law is very concerning from the democracy perspective.”

Still, Sochua maintains that such manoeuvring by Hun Sen will only undermine his party ahead of the next elections.

“If [the] CPP continues to threaten opposition MPs with arrest, detention and lifting of immunity, it only backfires, because they can’t change the constitution nor can they give themselves extra seats,” she said. “The people are now watching the situation very closely, and social media works faster than the pro-government media.”

RECOMMENDED STORIES

  • Breaking: PM says prominent human rights NGO ‘must close’

    Prime Minister Hun Sen has instructed the Interior Ministry to investigate the Cambodian Center for Human Rights (CCHR) and potentially close it “because they follow foreigners”, appearing to link the rights group to the opposition Cambodia National Rescue Party's purported “revolution”. The CNRP - the

  • Rainsy and Sokha ‘would already be dead’: PM

    Prime Minister Hun Sen on Sunday appeared to suggest he would have assassinated opposition leaders Sam Rainsy and Kem Sokha had he known they were promising to “organise a new government” in the aftermath of the disputed 2013 national elections. In a clip from his speech

  • Massive ceremony at Angkor Wat will show ‘Cambodia not in anarchy’: PM

    Government officials, thousands of monks and Prime Minister Hun Sen himself will hold a massive prayer ceremony at Angkor Wat in early December to highlight the Kingdom’s continuing “peace, independence and political stability”, a spectacle observers said was designed to disguise the deterioration of

  • PM tells workers CNRP is to blame for any sanctions

    In a speech to workers yesterday, Prime Minister Hun Sen pinned the blame for any damage inflicted on Cambodia’s garment industry by potential economic sanctions squarely on the opposition party. “You must remember clearly that if the purchase orders are reduced, it is all