Search

Search form

Letter to the editor: On ‘South China Sea fears laid at US’s door’

Letter to the editor: On ‘South China Sea fears laid at US’s door’

Editor,
With reference to the article entitled South China Sea fears laid at US’s door published in The Phnom Penh Post on March 13, I wish to state for the record the three flaws that made the article misleading and draw doubts to the editors’ motives:

1. “The South China Sea will remain a ‘hot issue’ due to US involvement in the region.”

Foreign Minister Prak Sokhon never said that. His general analysis does not intend to a point finger at any particular nation as alleged by the editors of this article. The statement he made during the workshop on March 10 was the same as the general analysis he made on global issues at the Annual Meeting of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation held from February 28 to March 1.

At the meeting, he stated that there were three signs that suggested the South China Sea issue would continue to be a hot topic this year. Firstly, was the statement made by US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson during his Senate confirmation hearing.

Secondly was the pledge by US President Donald Trump to increase defence budget that was already the world’s largest. Thirdly was the recalling of the Permanent Court of Arbitration ruling by some ASEAN member states

2. “Sokhon’s comments come at a time when Cambodian officials have begun conspicuously lambasting the US, reviving contentious issues such as the US bombings during the 1970s and Cambodia’s unpaid war era debt.”

The implication of Foreign Minister Prak Sokhon’s general analysis with other institutions’ comments is groundless. These are two separate and totally different issues. One is Cambodia-US bilateral relations while the other is a regional issue.

The article seems to allege that every comment is being made and calculated to launch a concerted attack on the US. This baseless accusation is misleading in regard to the general understanding on the current relations between Cambodia and the US.

3. “Cambodia has consistently backed China in its disputes with neighbours in the South China Sea, blocking ASEAN from issuing statements against Beijing.”

This is the gravest mistake in this article. Cambodia has never supported any country in territorial disputes. As a non-claimant state, Cambodia has very consistent positions in principle, which is permanent neutrality and that the disputes should be settled through peaceful means by parties directly concerned. I look forward to seeing this clarification published in a page of The Phnom Penh Post for the sake of truth.

Chum Sounry
Spokesman
Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation

RECOMMENDED STORIES

  • Breaking: PM says prominent human rights NGO ‘must close’

    Prime Minister Hun Sen has instructed the Interior Ministry to investigate the Cambodian Center for Human Rights (CCHR) and potentially close it “because they follow foreigners”, appearing to link the rights group to the opposition Cambodia National Rescue Party's purported “revolution”. The CNRP - the

  • Rainsy and Sokha ‘would already be dead’: PM

    Prime Minister Hun Sen on Sunday appeared to suggest he would have assassinated opposition leaders Sam Rainsy and Kem Sokha had he known they were promising to “organise a new government” in the aftermath of the disputed 2013 national elections. In a clip from his speech

  • Massive ceremony at Angkor Wat will show ‘Cambodia not in anarchy’: PM

    Government officials, thousands of monks and Prime Minister Hun Sen himself will hold a massive prayer ceremony at Angkor Wat in early December to highlight the Kingdom’s continuing “peace, independence and political stability”, a spectacle observers said was designed to disguise the deterioration of

  • PM tells workers CNRP is to blame for any sanctions

    In a speech to workers yesterday, Prime Minister Hun Sen pinned the blame for any damage inflicted on Cambodia’s garment industry by potential economic sanctions squarely on the opposition party. “You must remember clearly that if the purchase orders are reduced, it is all