Logo of Phnom Penh Post newspaper Phnom Penh Post - Samsung denied full exemption from tax bill through disputed patent-licensing deal

Samsung denied full exemption from tax bill through disputed patent-licensing deal

Content image - Phnom Penh Post
Attendees watch a presentation at the Samsung booth during Consumer Electronics Show 2019 at the Las Vegas Convention Center on Wednesday in Las Vegas, USA. JUSTIN SULLIVAN/GETTY IMAGES/AFP

Samsung denied full exemption from tax bill through disputed patent-licensing deal

SAMSUNG Electronics must pay 1.5 billion won ($1.34 million) in corporate tax, according to South Korea’s top court, which decided that the company’s patent-licensing deal with an Ireland-based conduit company was a tax-dodging attempt to exploit the special exemption clause in the South Korea-Ireland tax treaty.

The Supreme Court of South Korea on Wednesday ruled against plaintiff Samsung Electronics, ending the five-year litigation filed by the tech giant in 2013 challenging tax authorities’ decision to hold it responsible for 70.6 billion won in corporate tax.

“Of the total amount, [the company] should pay 1.5 billion won in corporate tax,” the court said in its ruling, only partly upholding the decision of an appeals court that said Samsung Electronics was liable for the full 70.6 billion won.
But taxes on overseas patents should be excluded, the Supreme Court ruled.

When the registered name and actual ownership of a given company remain at odds for reasons that give rise to suspicions of tax evasion, the incomes should be seen as belonging to the practical manager of the corresponding assets, who should be viewed as the taxpayer, according to the latest ruling.

Samsung Electronics in 2010 paid $370 million to global IP management company Intellectual Ventures in a package patent-licensing contract.

The US-based company claimed that its Irish subsidiary, IV IL, was the contracting party and that the deal was subject to the corporate tax exemption clause in the Korea-Ireland tax treaty. Under the Korea-US tax system, a licensee must pay 15 per cent of the licence fees as corporate tax.

Korea’s tax officials, however, argued that the Irish company was but a conduit company established for the purpose of tax evasion and imposed a 70.6 billion won tax bill on Samsung Electronics. While the lower court accepted Samsung’s arguments to the contrary, the appeals court reversed that judgment, holding the company responsible for the full amount. THE KOREA HERALD/ANN

MOST VIEWED

  • Kingdom may hire Turkish power ship

    Cambodia is considering negotiating with Turkey to hire a 200MW-capacity power ship to meet electricity demands as the country faces an ongoing electrical shortage, according to the prime minister. Speaking to garment workers in Pursat province on Wednesday, Prime Minister Hun Sen said Electricite du

  • Woman who scaled Cambodia’s three highest peaks eyes Everest

    One of the very few Cambodian women to have successfully reached the Kingdom’s three highest peaks is now eyeing Malaysia’s tallest mountain, Mount Kinabalu, and potentially even the world’s tallest straddling Nepal and China, Mount Everest. While in many Western countries it

  • Cheap, clean and efficient: The firm leading Cambodia’s solar revolution

    Sitting in her bright and airy 17th floor office, Rithya Menon, Okra Smart Solar’s lead firmware engineer, checks the frequently updating data telling her everything about how well their community services are operating. “I saw in the data that there was a problem with

  • PM Hun Sen: Cambodia will not die without EBA scheme

    Prime Minister Hun Sen on Wednesday reiterated that he would not be overly concerned if Cambodia had its access to the EU’s “Everything But Arms” (EBA) scheme withdrawn because the Kingdom would not die without it. Hun Sen was speaking to factory workers in