Logo of Phnom Penh Post newspaper Phnom Penh Post - Samsung denied full exemption from tax bill through disputed patent-licensing deal

Samsung denied full exemption from tax bill through disputed patent-licensing deal

Content image - Phnom Penh Post
Attendees watch a presentation at the Samsung booth during Consumer Electronics Show 2019 at the Las Vegas Convention Center on Wednesday in Las Vegas, USA. JUSTIN SULLIVAN/GETTY IMAGES/AFP

Samsung denied full exemption from tax bill through disputed patent-licensing deal

SAMSUNG Electronics must pay 1.5 billion won ($1.34 million) in corporate tax, according to South Korea’s top court, which decided that the company’s patent-licensing deal with an Ireland-based conduit company was a tax-dodging attempt to exploit the special exemption clause in the South Korea-Ireland tax treaty.

The Supreme Court of South Korea on Wednesday ruled against plaintiff Samsung Electronics, ending the five-year litigation filed by the tech giant in 2013 challenging tax authorities’ decision to hold it responsible for 70.6 billion won in corporate tax.

“Of the total amount, [the company] should pay 1.5 billion won in corporate tax,” the court said in its ruling, only partly upholding the decision of an appeals court that said Samsung Electronics was liable for the full 70.6 billion won.
But taxes on overseas patents should be excluded, the Supreme Court ruled.

When the registered name and actual ownership of a given company remain at odds for reasons that give rise to suspicions of tax evasion, the incomes should be seen as belonging to the practical manager of the corresponding assets, who should be viewed as the taxpayer, according to the latest ruling.

Samsung Electronics in 2010 paid $370 million to global IP management company Intellectual Ventures in a package patent-licensing contract.

The US-based company claimed that its Irish subsidiary, IV IL, was the contracting party and that the deal was subject to the corporate tax exemption clause in the Korea-Ireland tax treaty. Under the Korea-US tax system, a licensee must pay 15 per cent of the licence fees as corporate tax.

Korea’s tax officials, however, argued that the Irish company was but a conduit company established for the purpose of tax evasion and imposed a 70.6 billion won tax bill on Samsung Electronics. While the lower court accepted Samsung’s arguments to the contrary, the appeals court reversed that judgment, holding the company responsible for the full amount. THE KOREA HERALD/ANN


  • Government denies claims former Thai PM Yingluck issued Cambodian passport

    Government officials on Thursday denied claims that a Cambodian passport was issued to former Thai Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra, who reportedly used it to register a company in Hong Kong. The Hong Kong-based English language South China Morning Post (SCMP) on Wednesday reported Hong Kong

  • Diplomatic passports issued to foreigners to be annulled

    The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation will move to annul diplomatic passports issued to those not born in Cambodia. Analysts say the move may be in relation to reports that former Thai prime minister Yingluck Shinawatra used a Cambodian passport to register as

  • Hun Sen warns Irish MP of EBA ‘mistake’

    Prime Minister Hun Sen on Saturday told former Irish premier Enda Kenny, still a member of the EU nation’s parliament, that the 28-nation bloc should not make a “third mistake” regarding Cambodia by using the preferential Everything But Arms (EBA) agreement to “take 16 million

  • US senators call for GSP trade privilege cut

    Two US senators on Wednesday introduced the Cambodian Trade Act of 2019 bill, requiring the administration to re-examine Cambodia’s eligibility to access the preferential trade treatment granted by the US under the General System of Preferences (GSP). A Cambodian government spokesman said the move was