Logo of Phnom Penh Post newspaper Phnom Penh Post - Judging without influence



Judging without influence

Judging without influence

“Under such circumstances, you cannot release that guy on bail,” says a senior judge. “Why not?” a junior judge honestly asks. “Didn’t you watch TV last night or read the newspapers today?” the senior judge responds, and the guy remains locked up in jail.

While there are abundant comparative works with regard to the various constitutional and legal mechanisms built to help increase the independence of the judiciary, judges in many parts of the developing world remain prone to many sources of irregularities.

The best known sources of such irregularities usually include interference and manipulation from the Executive, the rich and powerful and, in many cases, it is simply plain corruption.

Examples of such practice are frequently reported on in the media. But those are not the only irregularities that we need to tackle.

There exist other improper acts happening inside the judiciary itself, often going unnoticed, which actually are just as bad, if not worse.

Consider the brief conversation between the two judges mentioned above for a second. A less-experienced judge asked for a specific opinion from his senior peer then acted according to the suggestion.

In other professions, exchanges of opinions may and should be very much encouraged. But in the case of the judiciary, such correspondence, however well-meaning in essence it could be, is very problematic for at least four reasons.

First of all, it is simply unethical. A judge should never discuss or disclose details of a case to another judge who is not assigned to work on the case.

Such correspondence not only could lead to the leaking of confidential details of an ongoing investigation but could also lead the asking judge to prematurely form conclusions based not on his determination but on an outsider’s, jeopardising his role as the adjudicator of the case.

Secondly, such correspondence immediately raises the issue of professionalism. A judge must be able to carry out his duties using his finest abilities.

If a judge, despite having gone through training, is unable to make legal assessments about the case at hand, he should honestly re-evaluate whether he possesses the needed capability required in the profession in the first place.

A mediocre judge, although impartial, can be as dangerous to civil liberties as any corrupt judge.

Thirdly, when a judge makes it a habit to contact other judges for various opinions and then follows those that fit with his particular interests, he cannot be said to have integrity at all.

There is a clear lack of integrity when he asks for opinions from another judge mainly to get peer moral support in order to punish those he may not like. Integrity also becomes an issue when a judge acts inconsistently in similar cases.

Finally, while ethics, professionalism and integrity are vital elements to help purify and sanctify the delivery of justice, an independent judiciary must, furthermore, avoid creating wrong expectations.

This is because improper judicial correspondence tends to create an expectation from the part of the responding judge who believes that the asking judge would comply with his suggestions.

If, in reality, it turns out that this has not been the case, this may unfortunately lead to resentment.

Such a scenario could practically arise when a judge of a lower court has asked for an opinion from a judge of an appellate court but then acted in contrast with it.

When the lower court’s decision is appealed against at the appellate court, the appellate judge, out of ego and resentment, quickly reverses the lower judge’s decision simply to prove that he alone had been right.

Wrong expectations do unnecessarily complicate the case.

In a land where the independence of the judiciary from other branches cannot be guaranteed yet, people can only hope that there is the independence in the judiciary itself by having each judge make decisions to the best of his ability and in his own conscience.

Preap Kol is executive director of Transparency International Cambodia.

MOST VIEWED

  • Omicron patients can stay home: PM

    The Ministry of Health has issued a directive on the treatment of people who have tested positive for the highly transmissible Omicron coronavirus variant, following a suggestion from Prime Minister Hun Sen on the night of January 21. The directive permits home quarantine for those who

  • The effects of the USD interest rate hike on Cambodian economy

    Experts weigh in on the effect of a potential interest rate expansion by the US Federal Reserve on a highly dollarised Cambodia Anticipation of the US Federal Reserve’s interest rate hike in March is putting developing economies on edge, a recent blog post by

  • Cambodia’s first ever anime festival kicks off Jan 22 at capital’s F3 centre

    Phnom Penh's first ever Anime Festival will bring together fans, artists, shops and other local businesses with ties to the Japanese animation style for cosplay competitions, online games, pop-up shops and more on January 22, with Friends Futures Factory (F3) hosting. F3 is a project that

  • Demining rat ‘hero’ Magawa dead at 8

    A landmine-hunting rat that was awarded a gold medal for heroism for clearing ordnance from the Cambodian countryside has died, his charity said on January 11. Magawa, a giant African pouched rat originally from Tanzania, helped clear mines from about 225,000sqm of land – the equivalent of 42

  • Hun Sen gets 4th Covid shot, urges compatriots to follow

    Prime Minister Hun Sen and his wife Bun Rany on January 14 received their fourth dose of Covid-19 vaccine and called on compatriots to follow suit as the Omicron coronavirus variant continues to spread in the community. This marks the launch of Cambodia's fourth-dose vaccination campaign,

  • Fourth dose Covid booster drive jabs 43K in two days

    In the first two days of the fourth-dose Covid-19 vaccination campaign, more than 43,000 people volunteered to get the jabs, while over 4.6 million people have received a third shot. Health ministry spokeswoman Or Vandine said that fourth-dose vaccinations, which began on January 14 exclusively with the Pfizer