Logo of Phnom Penh Post newspaper Phnom Penh Post - Battambang CNRP five questioned over Supreme Court ‘violation’

Battambang CNRP five questioned over Supreme Court ‘violation’

Content image - Phnom Penh Post
The meeting of the former CNRP at Battambang Province in the past. Supplied

Battambang CNRP five questioned over Supreme Court ‘violation’

Five of the 26 former members of the court-dissolved Cambodia National Rescue Party (CNRP) in Battambang province who were called before the provincial court was questioned by the prosecutor on Wednesday.

They are alleged to have violated the Supreme Court ruling that saw the dissolution of the former opposition party.

The questions centred on a Facebook Live video in support of CNRP co-founder Sam Rainsy being made “acting president” of the party.

Sam Sokong, the lawyer representing the 26, said Sam Vong Dara, Tan Sa Morn, Roeun Keb, Phan Reth and Saig Bunmao were questioned on Wednesday.

Vong Dara, the former second deputy chief for O’Mal commune, said after questioning that he had been asked about a gathering at Sin Rozeth’s Khmer noodle shop that took place on December 5 last year.

Prominent former O’Char commune chief Rozeth is due to appear on Thursday.

“The prosecutor said we had organised a conference. He said that if we had live-streamed a video, it meant we had held a conference. But we did not organise a conference – it was only a simple gathering."

“Someone with a camera just made a live video. We did not know that the gathering would affect anything or be misconstrued as incitement. I don’t understand what is considered incitement and against the court’s ruling,” Vong Dara said.

He said the court did not ask questions on anything other than the gathering and the video.

Former Kdol Dounteav commune chief Roeun Keb said that he’d had a similar experience in court.

“I told the court that I went to the gathering on my own. Rozeth’s shop was often frequented by many people. After questioning, the prosecutor told me that as the Supreme Court had dissolved the CNRP, we did not have the right to do as we wanted because it affected national security. That’s what he told me,” Roeun Keb said.

Some 100 people gathered in front of the court in the morning and around 80 came in the afternoon in a show of support for those being questioned.

Around 10 police officers were stationed nearby, said In Kongchit, a coordinator at human rights NGO Licadho who went to monitor the case.

In Rozeth’s December 5 video clip, which lasted almost two hours, more than 10 people, including former Battambang provincial chiefs and deputy commune chiefs, announced they supported the appointing of Sam Rainsy as acting president of the CNRP until party president Kem Sokha was cleared of his treason charge.

They said they would not accept any statement Kem Sokha made on behalf of the party in the interim.

They also said they believed that Kem Sokha would be released, the CNRP would be reinstated and Sam Rainsy would return to the Kingdom.

A Battambang provincial police document that The Post received on Wednesday said all 26 were ordered to appear at the court on May 8, 9, 16, 17, and 21 following summonses by deputy prosecutor Keu Bunnara.

The document reveals the 26 are regarded as “illegal opposition members with duties who are very active at the grassroots level”.

Sam Sokong said that alleging the 26 had violated the Supreme Court ruling for merely showing their support for Sam Rainsy was unreasonable.

“The gathering was among the rights all citizens have, particularly the right to assembly, the right to express opinions and the right to join any political party.

“A gathering to talk about president Sam Rainsy, Kem Sokha or the CNRP was not against the Supreme Court’s ruling because it made two decisions – to dissolve the CNRP and ban 118 of its members from political activity."

“But [the 26] are normal citizens and they did not criticise anyone or cause chaos or insecurity in the country,” Sam Sokong said.

Ministry of Justice spokesman Chin Malin said it depended on the court to charge them or not and on what grounds. This could only come after questioning had been completed, he said.

MOST VIEWED

  • Analyst: Rainsy blocked from boarding flight 'an excuse'

    THAI Airways not allowing Sam Rainsy on its route from Paris to Bangkok on Thursday is being used as an excuse to keep his standing among fellow coup plotters and his uninformed supporters as flights to non-Asean countries are available, an analyst said on Friday.

  • Rainsy lands in Malaysia

    Cambodian opposition figure Sam Rainsy arrived in Kuala Lumpur airport on Saturday afternoon after boarding a flight from Paris, where he has been living for more than four years. Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation spokesperson Koy Kuong said on Saturday that Cambodia respected

  • Touch: Rainsy will never return

    Sam Rainsy, the “acting president” of the Supreme Court-dissolved Cambodia National Rescue Party (CNRP), has claimed it has achieved 70 per cent of its struggle to find a solution to the current political situation in the Kingdom. Just before boarding a plane at Charles de Gaulle

  • Sokha continues call for dropping of charge after bail conditions reduced

    Not satisfied with having his bail conditions reduced, allowing him to travel freely in Cambodia, Kem Sokha says he wants his charge totally dropped. “As an innocent man who has been in detention for two years even without being found guilty, I continue to demand

  • MEPs' call for Rainsy's safety not European Parliament position

    The European Parliament said on Friday that a statement by 56 Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) calling for guarantees of Sam Rainsy’s freedom and safety should he return to Cambodia did not represent its position. Delphine Colard, the European Parliament’s press officer told

  • Sar Kheng: Rainsy return not blocked

    Minister of Interior Sar Kheng clarified that Cambodia had never blocked Sam Rainsy from returning to the Kingdom. However, he said Cambodia reserved the right to take legal action as allowed by law against activities aimed at destroying the Kingdom. “No one blocked the return