Logo of Phnom Penh Post newspaper Phnom Penh Post - New evidence allowed in Sokha trial




New evidence allowed in Sokha trial

Content image - Phnom Penh Post
Kem Sokha’s lawyers said the prosecutor had no right to add more evidence. Hean Rangsey

New evidence allowed in Sokha trial

The Appeal Court on Wednesday denied a motion filed by lawyers for Kem Sokha against the court accepting evidence added to the case by the Phnom Penh Municipal Court prosecutor. The judge said all parties could put forward more evidence during a hearing.

The decision was made by presiding judge Seng Sivatha in the presence of Prosecutor General Im Sophan. He said that after listening to arguments from lawyers on both sides, the motion by Sokha’s attorneys would not be accepted and a new trial would not take place.

“All parties [can] file new evidence. The remarks by the lawyers for the defendant, Kem Sokha, are not correct. Please look into the spirit of Article 321 of the Criminal Code.

“Evidence can be filed at any time if the [Appeal] Court finds it useful to find the truth. The prosecutor is the plaintiff and works for the common good of society. He can file evidence to find the truth,” the judge said.

The complaint stemmed from the March 11 trial. At that time, the Phnom Penh Municipal Court judge decided to accept three-pages of evidence that was added by the prosecutor. Lawyers for Sokha argued that the prosecutor could not put forward more evidence.

The arguments were repeated on Wednesday. Before concluding, one of Sokha’s lawyers, Meng Sopheary, said: “If the prosecutor can put forward more evidence, there is no need for the investigating judge. If the evidence is accepted, what will the future hold?

Sokha’s other lawyer Chan Chen said the prosecutor had no right to add more evidence and in his observation there has never been such a case before.

But government lawyers said the court had decided to accept the evidence and argued that according to the principle of equality, all parties could put up new evidence.

“Those who filed evidence for the first time are the lawyers for the accused party. According to the law, evidence has to be checked by all parties and then the trial chamber president decides to accept it or not.

“The accused party put forward evidence three times and the judge accepted it. At that time, why it is not said that the judge is wrong,” said Ky Tech, a civil party lawyer representing the government.

Speaking following the hearing, Sopheary said the decision of the judge is unacceptable and the lawyers would discuss whether to file an appeal to the Supreme Court.

MOST VIEWED

  • All inbound flights set to face added scrutiny

    Ministry of Health spokesperson Or Vandine said on Monday that the ministry is monitoring all inbound flights, after it was announced that only those from Malaysia and Indonesia will be temporarily cancelled from August 1. Vandine said on Monday that the two countries were identified as

  • Flights from Indonesia, Malaysia cancelled

    A Ministry of Health official has warned of the possibility of Covid-19 spreading through community transmission after the total infected cases in the Kingdom rose to 225. Ministry spokeswoman Or Vandine told reporters on Saturday that the possibility of community transmission cannot be overlooked and that

  • Man in quarantine dies of ‘overdose’

    The Ministry of Health on Thursday said a Cambodian migrant worker who died while being isolated at a quarantine centre in Tbong Khmum province’s Kroch Chhmar district may have died from syncope or overdose of tablets. In a statement, the ministry said the 21-year-old

  • Ministry set to reopen 20 schools in August

    The Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport will allow 20 high-safety-standards schools to reopen next month despite new cases of Covid-19 in the country. Ministry spokesperson Ros Soveacha wrote in a Telegram message on Wednesday that the schools are in Phnom Penh, Siem Reap and Battambang.