Logo of Phnom Penh Post newspaper Phnom Penh Post - Commune killing

Commune killing

Commune killing

Dear Editor,

The killing of Uch Horn, a SRP commune council candidate, on June 30 represents the

latest in a long series of campaign of violence directed against political opposition.

The motivations and causes of such a systematic campaign is generally well identified

and publicised. In particular, in Cambodia as in most developing countries, access

to economic resources and other productive assets is mediated through various social

channels or associations which are in turn structured and maintained, in a reciprocal

fashion, on the dual principle of patronage and loyalty.

The KR leadership, not withstanding its express contempt for this semi feudal relationship,

shamelessly exploited it by means of its self-proclaimed status and role as the peasantry's

protector and saviour. Post-KR regimes similarly sought (and seek) to forge a popular

constituency base by representing itself as the KR's nemesis to the latter's victims.

It is remarkable that this basic social hegemonic arrangement that underpins social

divisions and opportunities in Cambodia has proved to be an enduring phenomenon amidst

a succession of revolutions and regimes. No doubt, many who speak in favour of doing

things the Asian way, in accordance with "Asian values", perceive (accurately)

the threat that the expansion of civil liberty as a concrete force or process brings

to bear on their accustomed ways. We know at the same time that the legacy of violence

and civil conflict in the country demands and permits at best a slow and protracted

process as far as improved mechanisms for the protection of human lives and rights

are concerned.

However, my immediate concern is the fate of individuals like Uch Horn who, in the

absence of some means of ensuring personal security, are being sent like lambs to

the slaughter. The culture of "impunity" to which most human rights organisations

refer applies to violators of human rights as much as it does to those who are supposed

to be champions of the same rights, but who have out of some reason opted to turn

a blind eye. It may be that opposition workers operating in the provinces who have

received death threats or other forms of intimidation are entitled to some degree

of protection such as armed guards as given to some high profile politicians. This

may be a small price to pay for democracy to work and should be treated as an integral

feature of or condition for a free and fair election.

- Marith Pen

MOST VIEWED

  • US names new ambassador to Cambodia

    US President Donald Trump on Friday appointed W Patrick Murphy as the new US Ambassador to Cambodia, replacing incumbent William A Heidt. A press release posted on the White House’s website said nominee W Patrick Murphy is currently acting principal deputy assistant secretary at

  • Kingdom is at a crossroads between East, West after poll

    It was dubbed a success by caretaker prime minister Hun Sen after the electoral victory of his Cambodian People’s Party (CPP), which is poised to take all seats in the National Assembly. But the July 29 national election has not been positively looked at by

  • Chinese influence to sweep Kingdom?

    Growing Cambodia-China ties have seen the latter’s influence sweep across the Kingdom through increased investments and tourism. The Asian giant has become the leading source of foreign funds in Cambodia, fuelling the construction sector with huge casino and hotel projects. Much of the growth

  • Western poll flak is ‘pressure to take the Kingdom hostage’

    After last month’s national elections brought praise for the orderly manner they were run and managed, the ruling Cambodian People’s Party (CPP) spokesman Sok Eysan dismissed criticism from the West as a “violation of the Kingdom’s independence”. He said the attitude of