Logo of Phnom Penh Post newspaper Phnom Penh Post - Crimes out of date, claims Nuon Chea defence team

Crimes out of date, claims Nuon Chea defence team

Crimes out of date, claims Nuon Chea defence team

The defence for Nuon Chea on Tuesday added its support to a long-filed objection – first raised by the defence for the late Ieng Sary – arguing that the Khmer Rouge tribunal has no jurisdiction to try its client for grave breaches of the Geneva Convention, such as torture and wilful killing.

According to the original 2011 objection, the Cambodian law at the time the Khmer Rouge took power placed a 10-year statute of limitations on felonies, and since that window has long been closed, the tribunal has no authority to bring such a charge.

“The 1956 Penal Code sets out a statute of limitations of 10 years for felonies committed in Cambodia,” it continues. “Grave breaches must be considered a felony. As a result there is a 10 year statute of limitations for grave breaches. This 10 year period would have expired in 1989 for crimes which were allegedly committed in 1979.”

Under the principle of non-retroactiveness, a person cannot be charged for an act if the act was not a crime at the time it was committed, and while a UN convention banning statutes of limitations on grave breaches came into force in 1970, it was “not widely ratified” – and certainly not by Cambodia – the Sary defence argued. (Last Wednesday, Sary’s former defence team filed a brief making a similar assertion on behalf of their current client in Case 003.)

In its filing on Tuesday, the Chea defence concurred with the 2011 filing.

Since grave breaches were not part of the Case 002’s first sub-trial, Case 002/01, the court has, to date, never made a definitive ruling on the 2011 objection, court legal communications officer Lars Olsen said.

At the time the objection was filed, the prosecution counter-argued that the “exceptional nature” of grave breaches prevents it from being classified as a mere felony under the Cambodian penal code, and “customary international law” does not provide for a statute of limitations.

“Our position has not changed” since the 2011 response, prosecutor William Smith said in an email.

MOST VIEWED

  • Hun Sen’s China visit ‘a good opportunity’

    Prime Minister Hun Sen’s visit to Beijing on Sunday to discuss economic and trade issues presents a good opportunity for the Kingdom to strengthen Chinese ties and counter punitive measures by the West, an analyst says. The prime minister’s four-day official visit to

  • Former chief bodyguard receives royal pardon

    The former chief bodyguard of late Senate president Chea Sim has received a royal pardon nearly eight years after he was sentenced to 15 years behind bars on several charges, according to a royal decree dated November 12, last year, and obtained by The Post on Wednesday.

  • Close to the edge: Hair raising pictures from Kulen Mountain

    A new hair raising attraction on Kulen Mountain has finally opened to the public, with people flocking to the protruding cliff edge overlooking green mountainous forests to take photographs. The giant overhanging rock is situated in an area known as Mahendraparvata – an ancient city of

  • US warned not to interfere despite successful meeting

    A senior Ministry of National Defence official said the Tuesday meeting between the US Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defence for South and Southeast Asia Joseph H Felter and General Neang Phat had helped strengthen relations between the two countries’ militaries. However, a senior Cambodian People’