Logo of Phnom Penh Post newspaper Phnom Penh Post - Khmer Rouge Trials future in doubt

Khmer Rouge Trials future in doubt

Khmer Rouge Trials future in doubt

The future of the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC) appears

to be precarious. Civil society groups, and people close to the Khmer Rouge Trials,

are saying it is possible some of the international judges may walk.

The court's attempts to resolve widening rifts over the ECCC's critical draft internal

rules ended without agreement on January 25. Sources say resolution was reached on

the majority of issues, but "several" deal-breaking issues remain on the

table. Disagreements derailed the process in November, drawing allegations of political

interference from rights groups.

"There have been disturbing developments in the progress of the rules committee

and the future of the ECCC," said a press release from the Cambodian Human Rights

Action Committee (CHRAC), a coalition of 23 local rights NGOs, on January 24. "Including

the possible pull-out of international senior officials should the Internal Rules

not meet minimum international standards."

A source involved in the proceedings confirmed that negotiations over the draft internal

rules had once again run aground, but details of the dispute remain unclear.

"There is a division among the foreigners," the source said. "There

are some who are prepared to do anything to make sure the trial goes forward, and

there are some who will only go forward if it truly meets international standards."

Rights groups said the importance of international standards should not be negotiable.

"I understand the point of view of international judges [who may threaten to

walk]," said Kek Galabru, president of Licadho."They have their own reputations

to consider. With justice you cannot compromise, you cannot bargain: law is law,

international standards are international standards."

If the foreign judges feel that the draft internal rules do not meet international

standards they have no option but to walk out of the proceedings, Galabru said.

"If I was an international judge or prosecutor I would do the same," she

said. "I wouldn't want too be seen as playing a game or [participating in a]

show trial."

Agreement on procedure is essential for progress at the ECCC, said Chantal Beaubien,

legal assistant for the ECCC and the International Criminal Court program at Adhoc.

"This is an extraordinary chamber, so it doesn't function the same way as any

[Cambodian] court," she said. "You have to decide in advance how the court

will be run or you will really run into problems."

According to Beaubien, there are two possible causes of hold ups: technical legal

disagreements or the shadow of political interference.

"If the process is being politicized it will be difficult for the review committee

to come to agreement," said Beaubien. "[But] if the review committee is

arguing over technical legal issues then we see no reason why they shouldn't be able

to resolve these."

But Sara Colm, of Human Rights Watch, warned that technical disputes could be underscored

by political motives.

"We would hope that the issues do not include the ongoing debate about the defense

unit, because independent and qualified defense unit is non-negotiable," she

said. "A fair trial requires a robust defense from lawyers free from political


It is unlikely that technical problems are the issue, said Galabru.

"If the Cambodian side shows real political will, then I think international

judges and prosecutors would be happy to help," she said. "But they need

to show real will. If [the international judges] have suspicions, I think they will

walk and you can't blame them."

The Cambodian Bar Association (CBA) stance on the admission of foreign lawyers was

regarded as key to the earlier plenary session's failure. A CBA official said they

were not aware of a possible departure of foreign judges.

"Our position is that we want to see the ECCC move forward," said Ly Tayseng,

secretary general of the CBA.

Further delays could threaten the purpose of the trial, German Ambassador Pius Fischer

said on January 23.

"A lot of time has been lost in delays and some potential witnesses are now

elderly," he said during a seminar in Phnom Penh. "Very soon maybe the

logical reason will not be around any more. It is very important that this trial

starts as soon as possible."

Fischer said the EU was keen to see proceedings commence as soon as possible and

warned that Cambodia's handling of the trials was being closely watched by the international


"It is very important this tribunal will actually satisfy all international

standards and will be able to take off and grow as soon as possible," he said.

"We should have a trial as soon as possible."


  • Ministers to tackle sea pollutants

    Preah Sihanouk provincial authorities and members of local communities have collected 77 tonnes of water hyacinth at a Sihanoukville beach, Preah Sihanouk Provincial Hall spokesperson Or Saroeun said. He told The Post yesterday that the aquatic weeds had been floating along some of the province’s

  • EU timber deal in firing line

    A committee of more than 20 national and international organisations filed a petition to the EU on October 10 to prevent it from signing a timber trade agreement with Vietnam, noting that the deal would be disastrous to the Kingdom’s forests. The petition claims Vietnamese timber

  • Kim Sok to keep up fight ‘for change’ from Finland

    Kim Sok, wanted by the Kingdom’s authorities for defaming the government, reiterated on Sunday his determination to continue helping to make “a real change” to Cambodian politics after receiving asylum in Finland, even as a government spokesman mocked the political analyst over the development.

  • PM: Programme to recover Vietnam War missing back on

    Prime Minister Hun Sen has announced the resumption of the MIA programme to recover the remains of American service personnel missing after action on Cambodian soil during the Vietnam War. The programme was suspended for more than a year after the US government imposed visa