Logo of Phnom Penh Post newspaper Phnom Penh Post - KR trial's tribulations

KR trial's tribulations

KR trial's tribulations

THE United Nations' announcement in New York February 8 that it has withdrawn from

the proposed Khmer Rouge tribunal could spell the end of almost five years of discussions

on the subject between the UN and the Cambodian government.

The UN received the support of Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, which

said the UN "acted appropriately" as Cambodians deserved the highest standard

of justice. Privately, Phnom Penh-based diplomats were furious.

"Most criticism of the UN is about how it was handled. Do you cut them off with

a press release?" said one. "The manner in which it was done suggests an

attempt to provoke Hun Sen," said another.

The UN's former special representative for human rights in Cambodia, Thomas Hammarberg,

was less surprised.

"The [UN's] legal office has been skeptical all along. One reason is its limited

resources," he said. "And there was still the feeling that there were no

full guarantees to prevent political pressure."

The UN's chief legal counsel, Hans Corell, said the main reason the organization

pulled out was because the two sides disagreed over which document would take precedence:

Cambodia's law on the tribunal, or the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU), which has

not yet been signed.

The MoU was to deal with operational aspects of the tribunal, and the UN insisted

it prevail over the trial law. The government for its part demanded that the August

2001 trial law dominate the MoU.

At a press conference February 12, the government's negotiator with the UN, Minister

Sok An, told reporters Cambodia still considered the matter open. He said there was

a window of around three months during which time he hoped the two sides would reach

agreement, but gave no hint on where compromises would come.

Reading from a statement, Sok An expressed "dismay" at the "completely

unexpected announcement". He said the government had made numerous concessions

and the law already contained "all the fundamental principles agreed to between

the two sides during the negotiations".

Breaching a "gentleman's agreement" with Corell, Sok An released two letters

outlining Cambodia's responses to Corell's objections. The tone of the letters is

frequently exasperated. In them Sok An emphasizes that a number of the points raised

by Corell had been settled in previous negotiations.

In his November 23 letter, Sok An accuses Corell of "blurring the distinction

between the nature and purpose of the Law and the Articles of Cooperation [MoU]".

Sok An said the MoU's relationship to the law was a "non-issue". However,

the parties proved unable to agree even on a name for the document with the Cambodian

government preferring "Articles of Cooperation".

Sok An's letter informed Corell that the MoU's role was only to "determine the

modalities of cooperation ... in implementing those provisions of the Law concerning

foreign technical and financial support ... [and could] clarify certain nuances in

the Law, and elaborate certain details [but] it is not possible for them to modify,

let alone prevail over, [the] law".

Other sticking points were addressed in an eleven point response January to Corell's

October 10 letter. The government agreed international judges and prosecutors could

only be replaced by other internationals; defendants would be guaranteed their own

choice of counsel; the UN secretary-general had the right to appoint UN staff; and

the government would protect witnesses.

On the issue of amnesties the letter informed the UN that the draft law "makes

a clear statement of the government's intent not to request an amnesty for any person".

US Ambassador to Cambodia, Kent Wiedemann, told the Post he was surprised at the

unilateral announcement. He said it was clear from private conversations that Cambodian

government officials were "genuinely interested" in asking the UN to reconsider.

He criticized Corell, whom he said "did not bother to sit down and negotiate"

their differences. Wiedemann conceded there were "legitimate concerns"

about possible Cambodian manipulation of a tribunal, but felt they had been addressed.

He described the UN's objection to the pardon for Ieng Sary as "disingenuous

nonsense".

"The [tribunal] law states that the government won't ask for a pardon [for tribunal

suspect], and that takes care of it," said Wiedemann. "Ieng Sary's pardon

was narrowly focused on the crime of genocide, but the law spells out a host of [other]

crimes in Article 1."

Wiedemann said the US and other countries would push the UN to reverse its decision.

However, a source who has followed trial negotiations closely was skeptical.

"Senior State Department officials called the UN to lobby for action on average

three times per week during 2000; after the installation of the Bush regime, the

UN received approximately zero calls," the source told the Post. "The UN

could not fail to notice this change of emphasis, especially since the Chinese did

not stop calling to register their opposition."

Another source close to negotiations said it was standard practice that UN agreements

prevail over local legislation; the UN could not be bound by domestic law.

Corell said Sok An's November letter categorically ruled out that option. As the

UN could not guarantee international standards of justice, the source said, it could

not continue.

"It is a tragedy that 1.7 million dead Cambodians will not see justice done

in their name, but blame should fall where it is due," said the source. "It

is the fault of Hun Sen for making a credible international tribunal in Cambodia

impossible, and thus denying justice for the dead - not the fault of the United Nations

for recognizing that fact.

"It will be a show trial without the UN, [which] could not guarantee it would

not be a show trial even with their involvement. That is why they took the courageous

decision to pull out rather than risk being sucked into a non-independent process."

MOST VIEWED

  • ‘Education’ a priority traffic-law penalty

    A top National Police official on June 21 neither rejected nor confirmed the authenticity of a leaked audio message, which has gone viral on social media, on a waiver of fines for a number of road traffic-related offences. General Him Yan, deputy National Police chief in

  • Pursat Ford assembly plant opens

    The Kingdom’s first Ford assembly plant was inaugurated on June 16 in Pursat province amid rising demand for brand-new vehicles among Cambodians. The facility is seen as a game changer for the domestic automobile industry, which could bring a wave of investors seeking to cash

  • Volunteer scheme to foster ‘virtuous’ humanitarian spirit

    A senior education official said volunteer work contributes to solidarity and promotes a virtuous humanitarian spirit among the youth and communities. Serei Chumneas, undersecretary of state at the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport, made the comment during the opening of a training programme called “

  • Siem Reap’s $18M zoo said to educate public, help wildlife

    Angkor Wildlife and Aquarium Co Ltd has invested $18 million in a zoo in Siem Reap province, which will be opened in October to educate and promote animal conservation as well as attract national and international tourists. Currently, the Angkor Wildlife and Aquarium is building the

  • $50B infrastructure plan en route

    The government’s upcoming $50 billion,10-year infrastructure master plan will provide tremendous investment opportunities for domestic and foreign entities, transport experts and economists say. Minister of Public Works and Transport Sun Chanthol revealed the plan to Japanese ambassador to Cambodia Masahiro Mikami on June 15. At

  • Chinese firms unveil preliminary results on metro, monorail for capital

    Minister of Public Works and Transport Sun Chanthol and representatives from China Road and Bridge Corp (CRBC) and its parent company, the state-owned China Communications Construction Co Ltd (CCCC), met on June 24 for talks on results of the firms’ preliminary study on a potential metro