Logo of Phnom Penh Post newspaper Phnom Penh Post - Press Law fears

Press Law fears

Press Law fears

Dear Sir,

A s the Press Law draft is important for everyone in Cambodia, let me ask you to print my remarks in your next issue.

1- As reported by your July 1-14 issue, "Article 10 allows anyone who believes that any article or text, even the meaning of the article or the text is implied, or any picture, drawing or photograph affects his honor or dignity, such person may demand a retraction from and the right to reply to the publisher of the newspaper". This article has to be split into two parts for consideration:

  • The last: The right of response is fundamental as substance of liberty of expression. Nobody can oppose it. It has to be consecrated as general principle of law.
  • The first: The demand of retraction. As long as everyone is free to speak, to express his idea, nobody cannot oblige any one else to retract what is his opinion. Retraction sounds like a denial of the liberty of expression. As such, it is an unacceptable coercion.

2- Article 12 "allows the Ministry of Information to suspend a publication and collect its material in cases where risks to national security and public order are involved. However, the Ministry must get Court approval first".

This power given to the Information Ministry seems exorbitant.

How can an Information Ministry decide whether national security and public order are involved? Are public order and national security involved when an article mentions that military pay is not sufficient to let the soldier meet his duties normally, free from any corruption? The word involved is large enough to include every deed, even the most innocent one.

The approval of the Court doesn't change anything to the matter, since the Court has to decide prior to any legal proceedings. In fact before bringing a verdict, the judge has to follow successive steps, where the rights of defense have to be respected (if not, the whole proceedings are null and void). When the Ministry seeks Court approval, the judge hears only a sound, how can he make his judgment without being attracted into a prejudice in favor of the demanding party?

Should the Court give approval without hearing the accused under legal proceedings, the jurisdiction will be tied to its this approval when the matter comes to litigation. Finally, Article 12 is nothing but a trap to keep the judiciary at the Executive's disposal.

- Douc Rasy, Cambodian League for Human Rights, Paris

MOST VIEWED

  • Angkor Wat named as the top landmark for the second year

    Travel website TripAdvisor has named Cambodia’s ancient wonder Angkor Wat as the top landmark in the world for the second year running in their Travelers’ Choice Award 2018, an achievement Cambodian tourism operators expect will attract more tourists to the Kingdom. The website uses traveller

  • New US bill ‘is a violation of Cambodian independence’

    After a US congressmen introduced bipartisan legislation that will enact sanctions on Cambodian officials responsible for “undermining democracy” in the Kingdom, government officials and the ruling Cambodian People’s Party on Sunday said they regarded the potential action as the “violation of independence and sovereignty

  • Ministry’s plan for net sparks fears

    The government has ordered all domestic and international internet traffic in the Kingdom to pass through a Data Management Centre (DMC) that has been newly created by the state-owned Telecom Cambodia, in a move some have claimed is an attempt to censor government critics. Spokesman

  • Hun Sen detractors ‘will die’

    Prime Minister Hun Sen on Wednesday said those who curse or insult him would eventually die without a plot of land to bury their bodies after being killed by lightning, suffering the same fate as those who recently died in Thmar Baing district in Koh