Logo of Phnom Penh Post newspaper Phnom Penh Post - Sochua at ‘war’ with courts

Sochua at ‘war’ with courts

Sochua at ‘war’ with courts

OPPOSITION lawmaker Mu Sochua reaffirmed yesterday that she would refuse to pay fines levied after she was convicted of defaming Prime Minister Hun Sen, again daring the government to imprison her for failing to meet a court-ordered payment deadline.

As the deadline for paying the fine approached yesterday, the Sam Rainsy Party parliamentarian called a press conference to “declare war” on the ruling Cambodian People’s Party and the Kingdom’s judiciary.

“Today I would like to declare war,” she said. “It is not a war of weapons; I declare war as a democrat against the loss of morality and justice. I would like to tell people that the CPP must be held accountable before the nation.”

Mu Sochua’s fine is the result of a prolonged legal battle with Hun Sen dating back to April 2009, when she launched an ultimately unsuccessful lawsuit against the premier for comments he made about her during a public speech.

Hun Sen launched a defamation countersuit against Mu Sochua, resulting in her conviction last August by Phnom Penh Municipal Court.

She was ordered to pay a sum of 16.5 million riels in fines and compensation (around US $3,928), which she has repeatedly refused to hand over.

Mu Sochua said yesterday that she would not accept contributions from those who had offered to pay the fine, opting instead to let yesterday’s 5pm deadline pass and await her potential arrest. “Let the court take action,” she said. “I am prepared to go to jail.”

Khieu Sopheak, spokesman for the Interior Ministry, said that police had not yet received an arrest order from the court.

“The police are waiting for the court’s citation,” he said.

Neither Sok Roeun, the deputy prosecutor in charge of the case, nor Phnom Penh Municipal Court Judge Chea Sok Heang could be reached for comment yesterday.

Tith Sothea, spokesman for the Press and Quick Reaction Unit at the Council of Ministers, said that the government and the courts have never regarded Mu Sochua as an enemy, and that her case had been dealt with fairly. He said her resistance to the courts was a move to gain ascendancy within the SRP.

“She wants to go to jail so that she can be party president,” and the situation signifies a rift within the SRP, he said. He added, however, that her declaration of war was a sign of disrespect toward the court system.

SRP spokesman Yim Sovann said that Mu Sochua’s refusal to pay did not signify an opposition to the state, but rather a call to defend the rule of law.

“Mu Sochua is a representative for all women who struggle for a just and independent judiciary,” he said.

ADDITIONAL REPORTING BY JAKE SCHONEKER

MOST VIEWED

  • Proof giants walked among us humans?

    For years a debate has waged about whether certain bas relief carvings at the 12th-century To Prohm Temple, one of the most popular attractions at the Angkor Wat Temple Complex in Siem Reap province, depicted dinosaurs or some rather less exotic and more contemporary animal,

  • Japan bank buys major stake in ANZ Royal Bank

    Japan's largest bank acquired more than half of ANZ’s shares in Cambodia on Thursday, according to a statement from Kith Meng’s Royal Group. Japan's JTrust Bank, announced that they had acquired a 55% of stake in ANZ Royal Bank. According to a Royal Group

  • Long way to go before Cambodia gets a ‘smart city’

    Phnom Penh, Siem Reap and Battambang will struggle to attain smart city status without adopting far reaching master plans, according to officials tasked with implementing the program. The brainchild of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (Asean), the smart city program seeks to link up

  • New US bill ‘is a violation of Cambodian independence’

    After a US congressmen introduced bipartisan legislation that will enact sanctions on Cambodian officials responsible for “undermining democracy” in the Kingdom, government officials and the ruling Cambodian People’s Party on Sunday said they regarded the potential action as the “violation of independence and sovereignty