THE World Bank has confirmed it is investigating contracts worth $6 million in the
controversial $42 million demobilization program. Demobilization was designed to
retire tens of thousands of soldiers from the bloated military, which would allow
more money in the budget to be spent on social issues.
The Cambodian country office of the World Bank refused all comment on the issue,
but a spokesman based outside the country said the multilateral was looking into
the procurement process.
"I can confirm that the World Bank has declared misprocurement on a $6 million
component of the demobilization project. I am not able to give any more information
at this time," the spokesman said.
The Bank's website defines the term 'misprocurement' as "expenditures for goods
and works which have not been procured in accordance with the agreed procedures in
the Loan Agreement".
It goes on to state that Bank policy is to "cancel that portion of the loan
allocated to the goods and works that have been mispro-cured", and hints at
other unspecified measures.
One Phnom Penh-based diplomat expressed "concern" at the implications.
He was aware that some investigation had been done "on a confidential basis",
but said the country had to learn to respect international standards, particularly
on contract bids.
"Procurements are a problem. Due process is very important and we are following
that," he said on July 3. "If irregularities are found, then who knows
[what will happen]?"
The government's capacity to stick to the procurement procedures contained within
the Bank's $18.4 million loan had already raised concerns. A Bank report, likely
written in 2002, rated the risk of the government misusing procurement funds on demobilization
as "high".
The report flagged weaknesses within the Council for the Demobilization of Armed
Forces (CDAF), which is the government body overseeing the process. It found that
CDAF lacked "adequate capacity and experienced staff to handle the procurement
satisfactorily" and pointed out "inconsistencies between national and Bank
procurement guidelines". The Bank hired an external consultant to address that.
One of the Bank's main concerns was that the government tended to pay more than expected,
if the bids for contracts were unreasonably priced, and did not try to negotiate
better terms.
The Bank's website also notes that when misprocurement is suspected, the Bank will
send a letter outlining its concerns to the government before declaring misprocurement.
CDAF's general secretary Svay Sitha said he did not know of a notification letter
or any problems with procurement contracts: "If you have anything to talk about,
talk to the chairman, Mr Sok An."
Sok An, who also heads the Council of Ministers (CoM), confirmed on July 3 that he
had received a letter from the Bank on the subject. He had passed the letter to government
lawyers and said he was waiting to hear from them. He gave no further comment.
The current status of the demobilization program is unclear. It has been effectively
stalled for months, and it is not certain whether it has now been suspended, canceled
or will continue. More obvious is that corruption has blighted the process in the
past.
Demobilization was controversial from the start-there were reports that government
officials had stuffed the military list with false names, creating 'ghost soldiers',
to cream off the proceeds of the multi-million dollar project. That was confirmed
in a World Bank report in October 2002.
The problem was worsened by donors' inability to cross-check the database used by
CDAF with that used by the Ministry of Defense, which contributed to the Bank's inability
to check the extent of the ghost soldiers.
Another problem noted in the Bank's report was that soldiers wanting to leave the
army were paying their commanders to get on the demobilization list. There were also
extensive delays in getting reintegration packages to many demobilized soldiers.
Co-Minister of Defense, Prince Sisowath Sirirath, told the Post on July 3 that the
demobilization program was not under the control of his ministry. He expressed hope
that the next government would continue with the process.
"I think it is very important for our national budget to scale down the armed
forces, and Cambodia cannot demobilize our armed forces without support from the
World Bank and the international community," he said.
CoM under-secretary of state Sum Manit, who heads the anti-corruption unit, told
the Post that the unit had not received any complaints about the program.
"I am not dealing with demobilization ... and I know nothing about it,"
he said, adding that he dealt only with administration reform.
The demobilization program was set up in a bid to streamline the country's bloated
and inefficient military. Around 31,500 soldiers were expected to be demobilized.
A pilot program in 2000 saw 1,500 leave, while another 15,000 went in late 2001.
The rest were meant to be demobilized this year, but disputes between the government
and the Bank delayed that.
The political ramifications of the corruption scandal are as yet unclear, but it
could prove highly embarrassing for the ruling Cambodian People's Party (CPP), as
several of its senior members are involved in demobilization.
The government's auditing watchdog is the National Audit Authority (NAA), which was
established with assistance from the Asian Development Bank (ADB).
But Chan Tani, NAA deputy secretary-general, denied the agency had any responsibility
to vet purchases under the Bank loan.
ADB country head Urooj Malik disagreed: "The NAA is empowered by law to audit
any private sector transaction. The whole idea is to ensure transparency in public
financial management."
Contact PhnomPenh Post for full article
Post Media Co LtdThe Elements Condominium, Level 7
Hun Sen Boulevard
Phum Tuol Roka III
Sangkat Chak Angre Krom, Khan Meanchey
12353 Phnom Penh
Cambodia
Telegram: 092 555 741
Email: [email protected]