Logo of Phnom Penh Post newspaper Phnom Penh Post - From boomerangs to A-bombs? Oz debates nukes

From boomerangs to A-bombs? Oz debates nukes

Content image - Phnom Penh Post
Facing a wobbly ally in the US and an increasingly bellicose China, Australia’s foremost military strategists are cautiously debating whether the country needs to consider developing nuclear weapons. AFP

From boomerangs to A-bombs? Oz debates nukes

Facing a wobbly ally in the US and an increasingly bellicose China, Australia’s military strategists are cautiously debating whether the country needs to consider developing its own nuclear deterrent.

For a long time, the country’s defence forces had relatively little to worry about.

A century-old alliance with the US brought bankable security guarantees, while mineral exports to China ensured 28 recession-free years at home.

But Donald Trump’s limited regard for alliances and Xi Jinping’s quest for primacy in the Pacific have put both pillars of Australian security in doubt.

“Far from being in a strategic backwater, Australia is very much now a state in the front line,” said Malcolm Davis, a military planner who has long called for a rethink in Australia’s defence.

So far the response from Canberra has been cautious – trying to preserve the alliance with the US while trading with the world’s rising economic power.

But Hugh White – former adviser to prime ministers, and a doyen of Canberra military analysts – believes it is time to get off the fence.

Amid arcane discussions about strategic autonomy, interests and capabilities, his book How to Defend Australia, published this month, has ignited a firestorm of debate with one simple question: “What about nuclear weapons?”

White – a professor of strategic studies at the Australian National University – does not advocate for or against nuclear weapons, but says the question is becoming unavoidable.

Citing “big strategic shifts in Asia” he argues that “it is no longer clear that nuclear weapons would never make sense” to Australian defence.

“The strategic costs of forgoing nuclear weapons in the new Asia could be much greater than they have been until now.”

Developing even limited deterrence would carry enormous economic, political, diplomatic and social cost – requiring Australia to withdraw from the Non-Proliferation Treaty and provoking neighbours.

But the vast nation-continent may be extremely difficult to defend alone with a limited population and conventional weapons.

White argues that without a cast iron guarantee from Washington, even the mere threat of a nuclear attack from China could “force us to capitulate in a conventional war.”

Decades in the making?

The discussion is not completely out of the blue.

White reports that for decades Australian planners had quietly considered nuclearisation and worked on assessments of how long weapons would take to develop.

But until now Canberra always decided that the price was too high, the risks were low and Washington had its back.

But Trump’s capricious temperament means half a century of policy could change with a single tweet.

Meanwhile the threat outlook has changed.

Historical documents show defence analysts did not believe Australia would be targeted even in a serious nuclear conflagration between the US and the Soviet Union.

Bumping up against China seems much more likely.

And two regions inside Australia’s sphere of interest have become geopolitical hotspots – the South China Sea and the South Pacific.

Australian warships and aircraft routinely patrol through the South China Sea, much of which is claimed by Beijing.

Even when Australian ships stick to international waters, they are shadowed and challenged by the Chinese military.

In one recent incident, lasers were shone at Australian Navy helicopter pilots taking part in a months-long naval operation, forcing them to land.

Prime Minister Scott Morrison has launched a diplomatic “step-up” in the South Pacific – hoping to re-engage in a region that increasingly draws Beijing’s attention.

Critics have described White’s ideas as unaffordable, unrealistic and unnecessary.

“To put it mildly, the bipartisan political consensus on Australian defence policy is nowhere near White’s position,” Sam Roggeveen of the Lowy Institute said in a review of White’s book.

Nonetheless, Roggeveen went on to say that White’s view of a rising China and diminished US was “built on a dispassionate analysis” and was, to him, “convincing”.

Not everyone is as convinced, but the fact White’s ideas are being taken seriously speaks to a growing concern about Australia’s place in the world.

In recent weeks both a Chinese naval taskforce and a US assault ship have sailed into Sydney Harbour – the fact both were invited did little to quiet public debate about how Australia relates to the two world’s major powers.

MOST VIEWED

  • Second Hungary business forum set for H2

    Cambodia has asked Hungary to provide GSP- (Generalised System of Preferences) Plus facilities for when the Kingdom sheds its least-developed country (LDC) label, as the two countries prepare to hold a second business forum in the second half (H2) of this year to expand trade

  • Thai boxers to join SEA Games’ Kun Khmer event

    The Cambodian SEA Games Organising Committee (CAMSOC) – together with the Kun Khmer International Federation (KKIF) and Khmer Boxing Federation – have achieved a “great success” by including Kun Khmer in the upcoming biennial multi-sports event on its home soil for the first time, said a senior

  • Bullets to bracelets: Siem Reap man makes waste from war wearable

    Jewellery is often made from valuable gemstones like emeralds or diamonds and precious metals like gold or silver, or valueless things like animal horns. But a man in Siem Reap has approached the manufacture of delicate pieces from a different angle. His unique form of

  • 61% of 2022 imports came from just 3 markets

    The three largest exporters to Cambodia – mainland China, Vietnam and Thailand – accounted for 60.94 per cent of the Kingdom’s total merchandise imports last year, at $18.245 billion, which was up 11.99 per cent over 2021, according to the General Department of Customs and Excise. Cambodia’s total imports

  • CPP sets out five primary strategic goals for 2023-28

    The Cambodian People’s Party (CPP) on January 29 concluded its two-day extraordinary congress, setting the party’s priority goals for 2023-2028. The ruling party’s congress was attended by more than 3,000 members from across the Kingdom, including the members of the permanent and central committees,

  • Nearly 50 states join Kun Khmer Federation, all set for training

    In a little over a week, the Kun Khmer International Federation (KKIF) has accepted membership requests from 20 new nations, in addition to the exiting 29. The sudden influx of international recognition stems from the Kingdom’s successful introduction of Kun Khmer to the 32nd Souheast Asian (