Logo of Phnom Penh Post newspaper Phnom Penh Post - Expert traces KRT’s history

Expert traces KRT’s history

Expert traces KRT’s history

A noted Khmer Rouge historian, who resigned from the Khmer Rouge tribunal to protest against an alleged failure to fully investigate the court’s third case, released a paper yesterday reviewing the negotiations that established the court’s jurisdiction for who could be tried – what one observer called the tribunal’s “signature issue”.

Steve Heder, a lecturer in Southeast Asian Politics at the School of Oriental and African Studies in London, worked in the office of the co-investigating judges at the tribunal from 2006 until May.

Heder wrote that the history of negotiations leading to the tribunal’s jurisdiction “is of the greatest interest and pertinence to the current deliberations of the [tribunal’s] judicial bodies, including resolution of the ongoing controversy concerning widened investigations at the Court”, and suggested the court draw on that history in its work.

Debate over who falls into the categories of “senior leaders” of the Khmer Rouge and those “most responsible” for crimes carried out by the regime has taken centre stage at the tribunal as additional cases opposed by the Cambodian government appear set for dismissal. Heder traces the history of that debate from the fall of the Khmer Rouge to the defections of the 1990s through to the end of negotiations between the United Nations and the government in 2003.

Anne Heindel, a legal advisor at the Documentation Centre of Cambodia, said yesterday that Heder’s paper showed that the UN and the government had come to an understanding on “senior leaders” who might be prosecuted, but “could never reach agreement, outside of Duch, as to who would be most responsible”.

Nevertheless, Heder found that “despite some inconsistency, neither Hun Sen nor other authoritative [government] officials had definitively ruled out the possibility that middle-echelon [Khmer Rouge] cadre could be prosecuted, as long as early defectors like Hun Sen himself, Chea Sim and Heng Samrin were excluded”.

But uncertainty as to the government’s commitment to refrain from interfering in the court’s proceedings remained.

Heindel said the court was designed “fully expecting” political interference, but the history demonstrates that it still needs “vocal support from the UN to counteract any other type of interference that’s going on”.

MOST VIEWED

  • Proof giants walked among us humans?

    For years a debate has waged about whether certain bas relief carvings at the 12th-century To Prohm Temple, one of the most popular attractions at the Angkor Wat Temple Complex in Siem Reap province, depicted dinosaurs or some rather less exotic and more contemporary animal,

  • Japan bank buys major stake in ANZ Royal Bank

    Japan's largest bank acquired more than half of ANZ’s shares in Cambodia on Thursday, according to a statement from Kith Meng’s Royal Group. Japan's JTrust Bank, announced that they had acquired a 55% of stake in ANZ Royal Bank. According to a Royal Group

  • Long way to go before Cambodia gets a ‘smart city’

    Phnom Penh, Siem Reap and Battambang will struggle to attain smart city status without adopting far reaching master plans, according to officials tasked with implementing the program. The brainchild of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (Asean), the smart city program seeks to link up

  • China-Cambodia tourism forum held

    The Cambodian tourism sector must be prepared to welcome a growing number of Chinese tourists, as they lead the globe in the number of outbound travellers and were responsible for the most visitors to the Kingdom last year, the country’s tourism minister said on