Logo of Phnom Penh Post newspaper Phnom Penh Post - Incitement ruling criticised

Incitement ruling criticised

Incitement ruling criticised

THE United States and human rights groups have denounced last week’s Appeal Court decision that upheld a two-year prison term handed down to a rights worker.

Leang Sokchouen, a staffer for the rights group Licadho, said following Thursday’s ruling that he would not appeal to the Supreme Court because he had “no more confidence” in Cambodia’s judicial system.

Leang Sokchouen was convicted last August for spreading anti-government leaflets together with three Khmer Krom men. The Appeal Court upheld the ruling last week but changed the conviction from disinformation under the UNTAC code to incitement under the Kingdom’s new penal code, which did not enter into force until December.

The US embassy in Phnom Penh said that the US was “disappointed in the prosecution of Leang Sokchouen”, in a statement released on Friday.

The US said the right to free speech was “fundamental tenet of a democratic system of governance”.

“We hope that the Royal Government of Cambodia will seriously consider the negative effect that the use of criminal prosecutions in response to the expression of political opinions can have on this right,” the statement said.

The politicisation and incompetence of Cambodia’s courts are on full display in this case

Human Rights Watch issued harsh criticisms of the Appeal Court decision and called on donors to “press Hun Sen and his government to change course”.
“The politicisation and incompetence of Cambodia’s courts are on full display in this case, in which an activist has been imprisoned simply for criticising the government,” Brad Adams, Asia director at HRW, said in a statement on Friday.

“Sokchouen should never have been charged in the first place, but to have the charges changed on appeal with no opportunity to challenge them sets a new standard for arbitrariness. The government should immediately drop the charges and release him.”

HRW said Leang Sokchouen’s trial had been marred by “numerous procedural flaws as well as violations of fair trial provisions”.

Tith Sothea, a spokesman for the Press and Quick Reactions Unit at the Council of Ministers, defended the government’s record on judicial reform and dismissed the criticism of the court ruling as “normal”. He said HRW had “no right” to interfere with the court’s authority.

“The court has its independence and does not judge in order to satisfy Human Rights Watch, and sentences [are] based on the law and the actual offence,” he said.

Pol Sam Oeun, chief of the Appeal Court’s trial council, could not be reached for comment on Friday.

MOST VIEWED

  • Government denies claims former Thai PM Yingluck issued Cambodian passport

    Government officials on Thursday denied claims that a Cambodian passport was issued to former Thai Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra, who reportedly used it to register a company in Hong Kong. The Hong Kong-based English language South China Morning Post (SCMP) on Wednesday reported Hong Kong

  • Diplomatic passports issued to foreigners to be annulled

    The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation will move to annul diplomatic passports issued to those not born in Cambodia. Analysts say the move may be in relation to reports that former Thai prime minister Yingluck Shinawatra used a Cambodian passport to register as

  • Hun Sen warns Irish MP of EBA ‘mistake’

    Prime Minister Hun Sen on Saturday told former Irish premier Enda Kenny, still a member of the EU nation’s parliament, that the 28-nation bloc should not make a “third mistake” regarding Cambodia by using the preferential Everything But Arms (EBA) agreement to “take 16 million

  • The hairy little heroes saving many lives in rural Cambodia

    IN RURAL Siem Reap province, rats dare to tread where no person will, as these hairy little heroes place their lives on the line each day for the good of the local community. The rodents are the most important members of a special team, leading