Logo of Phnom Penh Post newspaper Phnom Penh Post - KR trial standards

KR trial standards

KR trial standards

Dear Editor,

In response to the Comment by Tony Kevin, "Rainsy and rights groups stymie KR

trial" published in the November 12 Phnom Penh Post, Human Rights Watch would

like to make clear that our position on any Khmer Rouge tribunal has consistently

been that it must meet international standards.

We agree with the assessment in 1997 of Prime Minister Hun Sen, who, in a letter

he wrote jointly with then co-Prime Minister Norodom Ranariddh requesting U.N. assistance

to organize a tribunal, stated that "Cambodia does not have the resources or

expertise to conduct this very important procedure."

We concur with Cambodia's three leading legal aid organizations, who have called

for an international tribunal and questioned the impartiality of the Cambodian judiciary,

especially in the politically-charged atmosphere surrounding a tribunal.

Even with international assistance, the Cambodian judiciary is not yet capable of

offering the fairness and transparency necessary to conduct trials of this sensitivity

and complexity.

The Cambodian government has insisted that trials be held within the Cambodian court

system, with a majority of Cambodian judges. Legal experts sent to Cambodia by the

U.N. proposed a structure for trying the Khmer Rouge that would both meet international

standards and allow for Cambodian participation.

We do not believe that organizing a tribunal under U.N. control constitutes a "humiliating

acceptance that the Cambodian state was too incompetent and corrupt to exert its

sovereign rights," but rather the minimum step necessary to meet international

standards.

In our October 22 statement, Human Rights Watch welcomed recent reports that Hun

Sen might be ready to resume discussions about a tribunal with international participation,

although we urged once again that any discussion be based on international principles

and standards. As of this writing we have not seen any details of what has been termed

a compromise initiative by the United States.

In the meantime, we will continue to urge that all parties - the Cambodian government,

the United Nations, and international partners - insist on fully respecting international

standards for trying those accused of crimes against humanity and genocide.

These are crimes of universal jurisdiction, and while sovereign nations have the

first duty to pursue justice, the international community has a legitimate interest

to intervene when fair trials cannot be assured or when justice will be incomplete.

Cambodia, and Cambodians, deserve no less.

Kenneth Roth, Executive Director, Human Rights Watch

MOST VIEWED

  • Ministers to tackle sea pollutants

    Preah Sihanouk provincial authorities and members of local communities have collected 77 tonnes of water hyacinth at a Sihanoukville beach, Preah Sihanouk Provincial Hall spokesperson Or Saroeun said. He told The Post yesterday that the aquatic weeds had been floating along some of the province’s

  • Negotiations on EBA being held

    In an effort to defuse tensions, a senior government official said Cambodia is negotiating with the European Union (EU) on the Everything But Arms (EBA) trade deal, which allows the Kingdom to export goods to the 28-member bloc tariff-free. The EU notified Cambodia on October 5

  • EU timber deal in firing line

    A committee of more than 20 national and international organisations filed a petition to the EU on October 10 to prevent it from signing a timber trade agreement with Vietnam, noting that the deal would be disastrous to the Kingdom’s forests. The petition claims Vietnamese timber

  • Kim Sok to keep up fight ‘for change’ from Finland

    Kim Sok, wanted by the Kingdom’s authorities for defaming the government, reiterated on Sunday his determination to continue helping to make “a real change” to Cambodian politics after receiving asylum in Finland, even as a government spokesman mocked the political analyst over the development.