Logo of Phnom Penh Post newspaper Phnom Penh Post - 'Modern' education?

'Modern' education?

'Modern' education?

Dear Editor,

While I thoroughly agree with Mr Ayres that the deeper characteristics of the educational

system in Cambodia are not due to its recent history alone, or even principally,

there are two points I should like to make.

The habit of learning everything by rote, of merely listening to teachers whether

they were good, bad or indifferent, is one that prevailed in Belgium when I was a

pupil, then a student here, in the 60s and 70s Whereas I found this infuriating and

did all in my power to subvert it, I was almost equally bemused by the diametrically

opposed system which I later encountered in the United States, where many students

seemed to think that they were not there to listen at all, but to expound their own

often jejune views.

I'm not sure that modern (or post-modern) system was based on problem-solving or

decision-making, it seemed to have so much to do with cockiness, bluff and self-marketing

... which I suppose is a form of decision and problem management - the presentational,

packaging form, so prevalent in our "modern" world.

This leads me to my second point: what we arrogantly, naively call "the"

modern, "the" development of benighted Third-World countries, is a recent

development within our own problem-riddled "First-World" countries (and

primarily, one particularly problematic country), a development out of a more tradition-oriented

approach which we recently shared (though to be sure, there were numerous differences)

with Cambodia and other "backward" countries.

What has only prevailed in our world for some 30 or 40 years (with no doubt some

earlier manifestations, Rousseau et al.) may or may not be established, legitimate,

efficacious in our not entirely successful societies, but are we so sure of its value

that we feel we ought to, and are entitled to, spread it, in however "indigenised"

(!!!) a form, all over the world?

This point is of course not in the least original: it is an aspect of the general

question as to whether the development ideology is a newish avatar of the "white

man's burden" or "mission civilisatrice" ideologies of the 19th century...

the plundering concealed behind it being of the globalised, not the national-colonialist

form. Perhaps at least more effort should be made to study what there may be in the

"fonds khmer" or its later indianised transformations that can lead Cambodia

on its own way into the fabled 21st century.

Philippe Hunt, Brussels, Belgium

MOST VIEWED

  • EU officials: Ending EBA an 18-month procedure

    EU officials have confirmed that it will take a total of 18 months to complete the procedure if Cambodia’s preferential Everything But Arms (EBA) trade agreement is to be withdrawn. According to EU Agriculture and Rural Development spokesman Daniel Rosario, the formal process has not

  • IPU slams government claim

    The president of the Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU), Gabriela Cuevas Barron, has refuted a claim by the National Assembly that she “highly appreciated the achievements of Cambodia” in its July national elections with a tweet saying “Of course not!” before adding “No congratulations”. A delegation from

  • Conflict lingers on Paris Accords

    As the Kingdom prepares to commemorate on October 23 the 27th anniversary of the signing of the 1991 Paris Peace Accords, which ushered in an end to nearly two decades of civil war, there is political conflict on whether the tenets of the agreement are still being

  • EU agrees VN trade deal despite rights concerns

    The EU on Wednesday agreed to a free-trade agreement (FTA) with Vietnam, a country described as having a “major rights-abusing government”. This comes amid the 28-nation bloc preparing the procedure for a possible withdrawal of Cambodia’s Everything But Arms (EBA) preferential trade agreement on