​Peace and principles | Phnom Penh Post

Peace and principles

National

Publication date
21 February 1997 | 07:00 ICT

Reporter : Post Staff

More Topic

The Editor,

I am compelled to offer Victor Keo a response after reading his letter in the

Post ("Controversy", Jan 24-Feb 6).

First of all, I must thank Victor Keo for his opposing views. It was my intention

in the first place to start a debate - not necessarily controversy - in regards to

the "peace and reconciliation" issue in Cambodia. At least I now know that

other ordinary people, wrongly or rightly, do care about this issue and are willing

to speak out. Cambodia must debate this thorny issue instead of keeping it quiet

and leaving it to a few politicians. In this sense, I applaud Victor Keo for his

courage and willingness to respond to this issue.

Second, Victor Keo - although I don't know him personally - has never really been

in "the same shoes" as a Ronnie Yimsut (as he claimed). Not unless he was

a 13-year-old boy when terrible things happened to him and his family during the

Khmer Rouge years. I am not just talking about having survived the Killing Fields.

I am talking about horrible things, such as the witnessing the execution of nearly

my entire family (nine out of 12 of my immediate family members, including my parents),

hundreds other close relatives, friends, and neighbors. I was there among the screaming

and dying victims. I still hear their plea for justice if not vengeance. I am the

only known survivor to walk out of a shallow ditch that the KR made all their victims

dig before they were bludgeoned mercilessly to death. I am still suffering to this

day, physically and emotionally, because of that ordeal - not just surviving the

KR's reign as Victor Keo did.

Third, I must agree with Victor Keo that Ronnie Yimsut's life in America is very,

very good in comparison to most Khmer (not all) in Cambodia. However, he totally

forgot to mention that there are prices one must pay for that "good living."

A Khmer in Cambodia or anyone for that matter does not "deserve" anything,

as Victor Keo asked or suggested. Everyone, including a Victor Keo or a Ronnie Yimsut,

must be willing to earn that good life and not just sitting around and bitching about

it. The good living does not come free, easy, or even very cheap as Victor Keo and

others might have thought.

Fourth, I must also agree with Victor Keo that we, as human beings, are selfish by

nature. However, I very much disagree with his suggestion or notion that we must

"sacrifice" everything in the name of "Peace and Reconciliation"

in Cambodia, like a "father would for his children". Well, as a father

of two children, I will sacrifice just about everything for them. I will not, however,

sacrifice my principles nor my moral responsibility for the sake of my children.

What would that teach them if I did? Without strong principles and moral responsibility,

a person has absolutely nothing!

It is all Khmers' utmost duty and moral responsibility to see that justice, not only

peace and reconciliation, prevail in Cambodia. And you don't compromise your principles

and your moral responsibility, the very foundation of your life, to get it. I want

to see Cambodia fully achieve peace and reconciliation just as much as Victor Keo

or any other Khmer. However, unlike Victor Keo, I also want to see justice in Cambodia

as well. Not just for me personally, but for millions of other Khmer, dead or alive,

who have been victimized in the last 25 years. Without justice, peace and reconciliation

in Cambodia is meaningless. I only hope that Victor Keo does not confuse "justice"

with "vengeance."

The Jews are still seeking justice even 50 years after the holocaust. It is not

about vengeance, but rather about justice. It is the Jews' duty and moral responsibility

to their dead.

If Victor Keo was really in Ronnie Yimsut's shoes, he would not allow the same people

who raped and murdered his mother, sister, daughter, and others to escape justice

- not even in the name of peace and reconciliation. His willingness to forgive those

who have committed crime against humanity, such as Mr. Ieng Sary, in the name of

peace and reconciliation is a total disrespect for the millions of dead Khmer. It

is a complete disregard for the survivors, including Victor Keo himself. What is

his next compromise in the name of peace and reconciliation? Forgiving Pol Pot, Ta

Mok, Son Sen? Why not go all the way? Better yet, why don't we release all the convicts

from all the notorious prisons in Cambodia, as proposed by King Sihanouk? Why the

double standard?

In regard to the old saying as Victor Keo quoted, "If you're are not going to

help row, put no foot into the water to resist the boat's motion," it is absolutely

ridiculous to use such a phrase. It is a prejudicial attitude that he and many others

in the government hold toward an opposing view, toward an opposition. I do my share

of "rowing the boat", within Cambodia and from the US, mainly as a volunteer

for no pay. However, I will "resist" a boat that is being rowed around

in a circle.

Although I may not agree with nor like Victor Keo's opposing views, I respect them.

I only hope that he also respects mine. It is the first important step in any peace

and reconciliation for the Khmer.

- Ronnie Yimsut, Oregon, USA. (Abridged)

Contact PhnomPenh Post for full article

Post Media Co Ltd
The Elements Condominium, Level 7
Hun Sen Boulevard

Phum Tuol Roka III
Sangkat Chak Angre Krom, Khan Meanchey
12353 Phnom Penh
Cambodia

Telegram: 092 555 741
Email: [email protected]