Logo of Phnom Penh Post newspaper Phnom Penh Post - Vague law raises citizenship fears

Vague law raises citizenship fears

Vague law raises citizenship fears

WHO is Khmer and who isn't? According to legal experts, the draft Nationality Law

now being debated by MPs is not going to be much help in deciding this touchy subject.

In fact, they say the draft is subjective, vague, inconsistent, in some areas unconstitutional

and, if passed unaltered, could be arbitrarily applied by authorities.

For example, Article 2 states that no Khmer citizen shall be deprived of his/her

citizenship or exiled. But Article 19 says the opposite, that nationality shall be

removed from any naturalized person who expresses "insulting and contemptible

behavior toward the Khmer race, commits crimes or other offenses harmful to national

security and interest".

The Constitution says that Cambodian nationals shall not be deprived of citizenship,

exiled or extradited.

"When you have nationality you can not take it away. If they want to deprive

[a person] off nationality, they have to amend the Constitution," said one legal

expert who requested anonymity.

Another said that article 19 violated the equality provision in the Constitution

by treating naturalized citizens as second-class citizens.

"Once a person becomes a citizen, he or she is equal to all citizens without

exception," he said.

Cambodians are unlikely to be treated harshly under the law. However, the experts

feared that the law could be used to discriminate against non-Khmer residents, especially

Vietnamese who are vulnerable to any eventual expulsion from the country.

They say the new law says that aliens wishing to apply for naturalization must provide

papers certifying them as having stayed continuously in Cambodia for five years from

the date they were given a residential card - a card that will be granted under the

Immigration Law.

"That means any paper issued by the State of Cambodia (SoC) government (up until

1991) will become worthless, and that was unfair", said one Western observer.

"I think Vietnamese [living in Cambodia] will be the obvious target. We don't

want to see this law implemented arbitrarily," he said.

While no identification cards have been issued under the two-year-old Immigration

Law, the content of the new law was "a step backward" in dealing with immigration

and citizenship issues, the observer said.

"They are denying the reality of history; it's as if the world begins the day

this [Nationality] law is passed," said one observer.

"Aliens who have lived here for years have to be here for another five years

to become citizens. This law does not recognize people's previous residence,"

he said.

"When they start giving ID cards they'll go from house to house asking people

if they're Khmer. The person who is going to decide who gets an ID is going to make

a lot of money," he said.

MP Ahmad Yahya proposed that the residence papers issued by the SoC regime to the

ethnic Vietnamese should be re-examined by the Government - and not automatically

denied - before deciding to issue new ID cards to them.

"The Vietnamese have their own territory. [But] if the Government wishes Cambodia

to become another Kampuchea Krom [in southern Vietnam], just give out many ID cards

[to Vietnamese]. That's up to the Government," Yahya said.

Another article requires that a child above 18 who was born in Cambodia but had a

foreign parent who was also born and lives "normally" here must also have

to apply for citizenship.

That clause was legally wrong and must be changed to ensure that all children born

here automatically became Khmer citizens, lawyers said.

MP Dit Munty argued for such a change during a Parliamentary debate on July 8, but

Yahya, who is also a US citizen, strongly opposed such automatic citizenship.

"Cambodia can not yet reach the stage of giving automatic nationality by birth

like in America. It is in a period of defending its identity and integrity,"

he said in a later interview .

Although most of the population believe they are Khmer nationals, lawyers argued

that "legally" they may not be so entitled as long as the law doesn't provide

legal grounds for them to prove the nationality of their parents.

"Nationality by birth is built on a circular debate that can not be answered,"

said one.

"Can you legally prove you are Khmer, your parents are Khmer and theirs were

Khmer?"

MOST VIEWED

  • Proof giants walked among us humans?

    For years a debate has waged about whether certain bas relief carvings at the 12th-century To Prohm Temple, one of the most popular attractions at the Angkor Wat Temple Complex in Siem Reap province, depicted dinosaurs or some rather less exotic and more contemporary animal,

  • New US bill ‘is a violation of Cambodian independence’

    After a US congressmen introduced bipartisan legislation that will enact sanctions on Cambodian officials responsible for “undermining democracy” in the Kingdom, government officials and the ruling Cambodian People’s Party on Sunday said they regarded the potential action as the “violation of independence and sovereignty

  • Long way to go before Cambodia gets a ‘smart city’

    Phnom Penh, Siem Reap and Battambang will struggle to attain smart city status without adopting far reaching master plans, according to officials tasked with implementing the program. The brainchild of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (Asean), the smart city program seeks to link up

  • Japan bank buys major stake in ANZ Royal Bank

    Japan's largest bank acquired more than half of ANZ’s shares in Cambodia on Thursday, according to a statement from Kith Meng’s Royal Group. Japan's JTrust Bank, announced that they had acquired a 55% of stake in ANZ Royal Bank. According to a Royal Group